IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world WGLC

Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com> Fri, 27 November 2015 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bingxuere@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E432C1B2A10 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:21:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z6OCRp2aLhKR for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22d.google.com (mail-io0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E06321B2A11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iouu10 with SMTP id u10so110661791iou.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:21:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=58bby7Xj8o9dtVoBT7dFhZxmAsxIBgIvxBwxG2aB1zU=; b=thM98UsurifMupuDPcM5rtrp00iVc6LqwIu/C+FygMSSjoGlt5xumWbQP5Dijv6lPz yulsEXw2pvAuu/S8lysVi2o9UMvWinCFhDpXe+AqixiyP+JYJpMyigbGYgbp5WIiEM5b OoFXDUf25wdB+uhGoVQaSRTtpLppKTF1KoCdnXnfMo7aDh47GZoO4hhNp/PxsbsbvXLW N6my9dgUj5LUclzNsgbDLfJ5TlgXdMzJhkkArfHTu/iZEi6UVF1+8z/D3fA17BLgIaqN D1c3te6nV7e+WthE0qph0osk62q4F/e7dqsfQ4r1G5BAnQb7f8ao7nYLQ5O7NWNR6zlO bfwQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.167.78 with SMTP id q75mr11021296ioe.36.1448616078316; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:21:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.142.68 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 01:20:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAH3bfABndQJSgq-skNmmN3dAOk62iYhe_YJhcxKSVhS1jn6L4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201511081900.tA8J02iD007338@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <CAHw9_iJBzXiJu7_O6ahaPFSDRs_y=1rWATALSnVR+QyLVdPo3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH3bfABndQJSgq-skNmmN3dAOk62iYhe_YJhcxKSVhS1jn6L4g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:20:38 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH3bfAACD+1doHmQG=zMA+m=BT3+AL-B0vBcpKSxJECLQaMfSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114293a8c399f505258236ba"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/zR-avEJIGaSm2KrSuUjx2JPROYk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:21:21 -0000

Dear all,

I've read this document and think it provides valuable information to the
community in terms of what is the reality with ipv6 extension headers.

I like Eric's proposal to remove the (mostly duplicate) tables.

Best wishes
Qiong

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:00 AM,  <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
>> > This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
>> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world.
>> > Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested
>> > wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater
>> > issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional
>> > issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the
>> > list.
>> >
>> > We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
>> > document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
>> > believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
>> > comment to make.
>>
>> I have read this and believe it to be useful.
>>
>> Nit:
>> I think that the acronyms in the tables (e.g DO8, FH512) should be
>> expanded, preferably close to the table.
>>
>> W
>>
>>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > v6ops mailing list
>> > v6ops@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
>> idea in the first place.
>> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
>> of pants.
>>    ---maf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ==============================================
> Qiong Sun
> China Telecom Beijing Research Institude
>
>
> Open source code:
> lightweight 4over6: *http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/
> <http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/>*
> PCP-natcoord:* http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/
> <http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/> *
> ===============================================
>
>


-- 
==============================================
Qiong Sun
China Telecom Beijing Research Institude


Open source code:
lightweight 4over6: *http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/
<http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/>*
PCP-natcoord:* http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/
<http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/> *
===============================================

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email