Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4245)
Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Mon, 02 March 2015 14:41 UTC
Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5601A87BB for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:41:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CJPVbkRIrm_e for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com (mail-la0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C82D91A87A7 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:41:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lams18 with SMTP id s18so30662040lam.11 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:41:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UkoeyLQVSjZdbegNeqKC6LOtyY29qTu4eR/RBK/fvJI=; b=GZDo71Ki/MxA0wH/8gL8HAj0nXAq8aVNMKCch1yZaltIyMAY2n7NPmfcUEwblrMPR3 2FgMDPLEfDBMiOkKWdMLit58hGtnjEy6N//MPQkRIyM6h8jfp1+4QcxKgTdPEzWJjk5M 9Yms63z6+qvBnHyP7FRhmvUUXhGd99zVRgU1LKToENwuxrfqm0yE2Qjg1RP4JyPWBcj/ V6ARfX5l5JqOp53Q4w6uJSXf7hAm3T1NCabAROqHT3WhxoCtj/IsVXrHIriZj4nBGoIY TC5mBmM/F+rSS71N6shPdcVrjxMWgEySCyVsknBH5w3FfrrN9qPmTYx/9oPXdk5Wmmqp Q4BQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlO0e+kx1Xai40HUU+Fc1sXz03QbeU7YD49jN/KrlTQdgkRBCfQ+teO2PJvnKiXTMOPJgwI
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.207.72 with SMTP id lu8mr19705815lac.90.1425307273216; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.205.144 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:41:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJL0+x5uA2Z9CnW3FjysZntCgK_24eCVHUThme7WJkjzYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150127140643.86577180489@rfc-editor.org> <CALaySJL0+x5uA2Z9CnW3FjysZntCgK_24eCVHUThme7WJkjzYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:41:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CANO7kWDQL79YjZSjHaKtovvx=tZmYAE6TnOY1RcbH3CyhScO2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11346650b75d3205104f35eb"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vcarddav/4bS3iUd1EC2rDrDdJoc59JOy2to>
Cc: ivan.enderlin@fruux.com, CardDAV <vcarddav@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4245)
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav/>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:41:20 -0000
Although the original text would not cause interoperability issues, the corrected text is more accurate and better represents the WG's consensus at the time the RFC was published. I am thoroughly confused about errata statuses, so I won't make a recommandation. ;) Simon On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > Simon, can you please comment on this errata report? > > Thanks, > Barry > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:06 PM, RFC Errata System > <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6350, > > "vCard Format Specification". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6350&eid=4245 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Technical > > Reported by: Ivan Enderlin <ivan.enderlin@fruux.com> > > > > Section: 6.7.7 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > Value type: A semicolon-separated pair of values. The first field > > is a small integer corresponding to the second field of a PID > > parameter instance. The second field is a URI. The "uuid" URN > > namespace defined in [RFC4122] is particularly well suited to this > > task, but other URI schemes MAY be used. > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > Value type: A single structured text value consisting of components > > separated by the SEMICOLON character (U+003B). The first > > component is a small integer corresponding to the second > > component of a PID parameter instance. The second component is a > > URI. The "uuid" URN namespace defined in [RFC4122] is particularly > > well suited to this task, but other URI schemes MAY be used. > > > > > > Notes > > ----- > > A "semicolon-separated pair of values" is a structured text value. > Moreover, the RFC6351 considers the CLIENTPIDMAP property with a structured > text value (see the Relax NG Schema definition of property-clientpidmap). > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC6350 (draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-22) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : vCard Format Specification > > Publication Date : August 2011 > > Author(s) : S. Perreault > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : vCard and CardDAV > > Area : Applications > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > >
- [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6350 (4… RFC Errata System
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Barry Leiba
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Simon Perreault
- Re: [VCARDDAV] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC635… Barry Leiba
- [VCARDDAV] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6… RFC Errata System