Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard RDF update...

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Wed, 10 October 2012 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E964421F86D0 for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsjQI9waw5aW for <vcarddav@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F293021F8629 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 06:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.58.43] (modemcable186.124-70-69.static.videotron.ca [69.70.124.186]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFD00415CD; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:16 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <50756F2B.9030706@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:15 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <488D2B22-A6C7-405E-AA88-1C675666767B@viagenie.ca>
References: <604A35DF-6808-4672-AD8A-6D2526278E2E@iannella.it> <50743A5F.8000004@viagenie.ca> <48DA179E-294E-4B8C-8325-96A0992D3E83@iannella.it> <CAC4RtVCfzksJHvXj4L_1O-xKsk_+mPSZZR=+0dWvC=W=0v7+Aw@mail.gmail.com> <BC3A2E44-FCC4-424E-9527-64E977B06171@iannella.it> <50756F2B.9030706@viagenie.ca>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, vcarddav@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] vCard RDF update...
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:15:21 -0000

Le 2012-10-10 à 08:50, Simon Perreault a écrit :

> Le 2012-10-09 20:32, Renato Iannella a écrit :
>> This is interesting, as when I read the definition of ORG, it says "to specify the org name/units *associated* with the vCard"
>> So does "associated" mean there is some legal/governance structure between them, or is it more broader?
>> For example, could I put Ford Motor Company (a totally separate company) as ABC Marketing do some work for them?
> 
> Probably just a sample of my bad Frenglish. It should be understood as: "to specify the org name/units of the object represented by the vCard".
> 

if this is ambiguous to many, I would suggest to fill out an errata and confirm it as "very mild", so at least a new version of the RFC would be fixed.

Marc.

> Simon
> -- 
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
> _______________________________________________
> VCARDDAV mailing list
> VCARDDAV@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav