IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [video-codec] draft-maxwell-videocodec-requirements

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org> Wed, 05 December 2012 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <tterribe@xiph.org>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD5D21F8BB0 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:23:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMrQcoDMr89f for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:23:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx2.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9932E21F841F for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:23:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.250.6.54] (unknown [63.245.220.240]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by mx2.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70335F20E1 for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:23:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50BE9402.4030103@xiph.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:23:30 -0800
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe@xiph.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120626 SeaMonkey/2.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "video-codec@ietf.org" <video-codec@ietf.org>
References: <9B8EA46C78239244B5F7A07E163D3DFE049149@CH1PRD0511MB432.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CACNoOsE+-NA+AvDRu0_H1ism0DkHCGtMGE6_jwEbW-5W46Qzyw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACNoOsE+-NA+AvDRu0_H1ism0DkHCGtMGE6_jwEbW-5W46Qzyw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [video-codec] draft-maxwell-videocodec-requirements
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:23:30 -0000

Jozsef Vass wrote:
> 4.  What about some kind of scalable scheme? It maybe advantageous in a
> conference scenario.

Your other comments are good, but I think scalability is mostly a waste 
of time. The full resolution case winds up being somewhat less 
bitrate-efficient, and this is the part that contains most of the bits. 
This is enough that simulcast actually competes fairly well, is much, 
much simpler, and avoids a host of IPR issues.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email