[video-codec] Confirmation of consensus: publication of Requirements and Testing documents
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 29 November 2016 02:24 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C9512A257 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:24:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQ_f6wU3-EZe for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:24:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF84112A254 for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:24:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uAT2O19n052182 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:24:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: "video-codec@ietf.org" <video-codec@ietf.org>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <27c8d6a1-e8e7-6777-87e9-b306db4e7bf3@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:24:01 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/video-codec/K49y5osMyyB8KicsvwUrELRuF0E>
Subject: [video-codec] Confirmation of consensus: publication of Requirements and Testing documents
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/video-codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 02:24:03 -0000
[as chair] At the face-to-face meeting in Seoul two weeks ago, the consensus in the room was to publish both the requirements and testing documents as RFCs, with the key rationale being that the ability to cite these documents in our final codec specification documents is expected to be quite useful. This message is reconfirming this consensus on the mailing list. If you disagree with publication of these documents as RFCs upon their completion, please speak up on this mailing list within the next two weeks. Thanks! /a