Re: [video-codec] videocodec coordination
Nathan Egge <negge@dgql.org> Thu, 01 November 2012 14:06 UTC
Return-Path: <negge@dgql.org>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF6921F8CC5 for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eMS+HixHR0ZB for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com (mail-qc0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE66C21F8CD1 for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id b25so1909127qca.31 for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=AOkvCbGVb0P4zzq3erDbS0BSAtcwRIMsA9GyPB9ji0M=; b=mirkBRCbcZ3mx+JiRLgSrnMcdmXocATyhhwm5HBOFKTjbhX8se3V9jr/kcsScjyacG WYhZpewJVlGNtlvTbykUuYglAblbOkZi52fOn9qrxDeYU9WiX+EE8xSpRirTGLoKV8jj jw8UfI25on+8LpqRpMkTs9x67GTJVpC3aW3mKWq4iHX3MVS44MbgfLpkZb6kahgWiBP4 AAOUl5WwN0j1/GxY9vemYa6L1/0mXQAzOPzhvjRIDOQWdgNqq9yOSnBSZaCxE1jNQYiX 8nBLyKT9VGqaEk4mBgpCRx/Tj1DKUCfjJf0TOSef/orOV8yIJrp7THnd3SU5OgtHplai OvZQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.127.115 with SMTP id nf19mr32828021qeb.36.1351778795256; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.98.36 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [207.244.165.201]
In-Reply-To: <509185C7.5060901@mozilla.com>
References: <507EEDB1.6030404@stpeter.im> <CAHBDyN6rVMEyBx9yVkm_npQmASpOZiit5E8uYHcRkOyoG1VOkQ@mail.gmail.com> <50903B5B.1040600@stpeter.im> <20121030184410.2cncwld79ckg08ww@kizuka.merseine.nu> <CAPVCLWbcso74uJsSOgQf1qHLqUT_kmzP-d-tg_KMwR=W1xow3w@mail.gmail.com> <509185C7.5060901@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:06:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+Xd9X8k=ik=pQc1Rbg+tcr19SiqbfFbWjZhd-CPK0-U=7B4DA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nathan Egge <negge@dgql.org>
To: video-codec@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d58d2e7f9a704cd6f863d"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnalXspiFazylSfuUeTiTuBU3r2TRvOXksOUsRQnpTxKbyb1g8HbmxzeglOmsFdOpAS8But
Subject: Re: [video-codec] videocodec coordination
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:06:36 -0000
This works for me as well. On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@mozilla.com>wrote: > Works for me too. > > On 12-10-30 07:30 PM, Adrian Grange wrote: > > Monday breakfast works for me. > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry > > <tterribe@xiph.org <mailto:tterribe@xiph.org>> wrote: > > > > Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>> > > wrote: > > > > Breakfast on Monday works for me. > > > > > > It works for me, also. > > > > > > And while we're chatting, I need to ask our presenters: how are > > those > > slides coming along? It would be very helpful if you could all > have > > > > > > I haven't started mine, but I should probably be able to put > > something together over the next 48ish hours. > > > > >
- Re: [video-codec] videocodec coordination Nathan Egge
- Re: [video-codec] videocodec coordination Peter Saint-Andre