Re: [video-codec] Call for Adoption: Requirements and Testing

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FDD1A002C for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:31:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldC4kMWkF1DC for <video-codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:31:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E70E1A0021 for <video-codec@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:31:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id tAIHVttN093483 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:31:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: "video-codec@ietf.org" <video-codec@ietf.org>, draft-daede-netvc-testing@tools.ietf.org, draft-filippov-netvc-requirements@tools.ietf.org
References: <5637249B.4050809@nostrum.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <564CB60B.8090309@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:31:55 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5637249B.4050809@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/video-codec/XxZdwrk_49XKgDJkXmclY58vD9s>
Subject: Re: [video-codec] Call for Adoption: Requirements and Testing
X-BeenThere: video-codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Video codec BoF discussion list <video-codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/video-codec/>
List-Post: <mailto:video-codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec>, <mailto:video-codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:31:58 -0000

[as chair]

Hearing no objections, and having seen support in the face-to-face 
meeting, these documents are now adopted as working group items.

The chairs request that the authors upload a copy of each document as 
soon as practical, using the names draft-ietf-netvc-testing-00 and 
draft-ietf-netvc-requirements-00. The contents of the document should be 
substantively the same as the existing versions.

Thanks!

/a

On 11/2/15 02:53, Adam Roach wrote:
> [as chair]
>
> Today, we gauged the sentiment of the participants in the NETVC 
> meeting regarding the adoption of two documents as working group 
> items. In both cases, there was universal support for adoption among 
> those who expressed a sentiment. This message is a formal on-list 
> confirmation of the result of that poll. If you have comments about 
> either of the proposed adoptions, please send feedback to the mailing 
> list no later than Tuesday, November 17th.
>
> The proposed adoptions are:
>
> draft-daede-netvc-testing-02 as the basis for fulfilling the milestone 
> "Test result document to IESG, if the WG so chooses (Informational)"
>
> draft-filippov-netvc-requirements-02 as the basis for fulfilling the 
> milestone " Requirements and evaluation criteria to IESG, if the WG so 
> chooses (Informational)"
>
> Note that this call for adoption does not presuppose the outcome of 
> the clause "if the WG so chooses." We plan to call for consensus 
> regarding the decision to request publication of these documents as 
> RFCs as the working group concludes its work on them.
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> video-codec mailing list
> video-codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec