Re: [VIPR] draft-jennings-vipr-overview-00, Clarification Suggestion for Introduction
Ken Fischer <ietf@kenfischer.net> Thu, 28 April 2011 15:55 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kenfischer.net>
X-Original-To: vipr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vipr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D19E06F0 for <vipr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.699, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nbbiUrzVOev7 for <vipr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B64E0685 for <vipr@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034B754077 for <vipr@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.108] (c-24-9-47-190.hsd1.co.comcast.net [24.9.47.190]) (Authenticated sender: ietf@kenfischer.net) by homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 88E965406F for <vipr@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:55:52 -0600
From: Ken Fischer <ietf@kenfischer.net>
Sender: Ken Fischer <ken.fischer@bt.com>
To: "vipr@ietf.org" <vipr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C9DEE6EF.EF2E%ken.fischer@bt.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-jennings-vipr-overview-00, Clarification Suggestion for Introduction
In-Reply-To: <C9DDED31.1563C%d.malas@cablelabs.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3386829355_55804617"
Subject: Re: [VIPR] draft-jennings-vipr-overview-00, Clarification Suggestion for Introduction
X-BeenThere: vipr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Verification Involving PSTN Reachability working group <vipr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vipr>, <mailto:vipr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vipr>
List-Post: <mailto:vipr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vipr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vipr>, <mailto:vipr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:55:59 -0000
In Prague I agreed to review the overview draft, and provide
comments/changes. Based on some of the discussions at the meeting, I think
we should add something to Page 5, paragraph 3. The private federations are
good, but limit innovation. I think the private federation sentence should
be re-written to something like:
Though SIP is used between domains, it is typically through private
federation agreements. While such agreements are positive, they cause a
"least common denominator" problem, which has limited the growth of advanced
SIP features,
and prevented the innovation that we expected SIP to drive.
Maybe this belongs some other place in the introduction, but I think this is
about more than just any-to-any for the sake of any-to-any. Its about the
feature improvement that can flourish when non-supportive intermediaries are
removed from the path.
Ken
- [VIPR] 80th IETF ViPR Meeting Notes Posted Daryl Malas
- Re: [VIPR] draft-jennings-vipr-overview-00, Clari… Ken Fischer
- Re: [VIPR] draft-jennings-vipr-overview-00, Clari… Cullen Jennings