[vmeet] draft-narten-ietf-remote-participation-00.txt
Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 15 October 2009 13:14 UTC
Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECBF3A6855 for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aql3E95qaWns for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com (e4.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.144]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD473A680F for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (d01relay06.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.116]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9FD6xQn020652 for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:06:59 -0400
Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n9FDEZT42609182 for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:14:35 -0400
Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n9FDEYZ9021498 for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:14:34 -0600
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-65-209-137.mts.ibm.com [9.65.209.137]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n9FDEWtO021416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:14:34 -0600
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.12.5) with ESMTP id n9FDEW7f024461 for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:14:32 -0400
Message-Id: <200910151314.n9FDEW7f024461@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: vMeet@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:14:32 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [vmeet] draft-narten-ietf-remote-participation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:14:37 -0000
Just an FYI that I wrote up some of my thoughts on remote participation just prior to the last IETF meeting. I've gotten a few private followups and intend to revise it before the cutoff in 10 days. Separately, I'm a bit surprised that this list has been so quiet since the last meeting. Surely the purpose of this group is still timely? Are we in a position to make any recommendations or suggestions to the IESG in terms of things to do to facilitate remote participation at the upcoming Hiroshima meeting? I note that there have been several interim WG meetings in the last few months and we should have more experience to learn from. Thomas
- [vmeet] draft-narten-ietf-remote-participation-00… Thomas Narten