IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vmeet] [Fwd: [rt.amsl.com #15164] 'attendance' numbers for interimmeetings]

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 12 May 2009 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639E43A6A16 for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2009 09:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.66
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-5.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, FS_BROKEN_MEETING=10.357]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3hHO5VWWAu9u for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2009 09:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1959E3A6924 for <vMeet@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2009 09:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (adsl-68-122-32-149.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.32.149]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4CH0jW6001402 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 May 2009 10:00:50 -0700
Message-ID: <4A09AB3D.8060700@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:00:45 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>
References: <4A09A687.4040806@dcrocker.net> <DAA7A6EBE59347C4AFC07758D2852327@GIH.CO.UK>
In-Reply-To: <DAA7A6EBE59347C4AFC07758D2852327@GIH.CO.UK>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 12 May 2009 10:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: vMeet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [vmeet] [Fwd: [rt.amsl.com #15164] 'attendance' numbers for interimmeetings]
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:59:25 -0000

no, except for the ipsecme, per Thomas.

d/

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> Any knowledge of what software they were using?
> O.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave CROCKER" <dhc@dcrocker.net>
> To: <vMeet@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 6:40 PM
> Subject: [vmeet] [Fwd: [rt.amsl.com #15164] 'attendance' numbers for 
> interimmeetings]
> 
> 
>> Folks,
>>
>> FYI, here's some data on interim meeting participation:
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email