Re: [vnrg] FlowVisor : A Network Virtualization Layer
Aaron Falk <falk@bbn.com> Tue, 09 November 2010 02:14 UTC
Return-Path: <falk@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: vnrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14993A6A14 for <vnrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:14:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.314
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.314 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.286, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iQ6gehVvJ7gx for <vnrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:14:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF063A69FE for <vnrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:14:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.89.253.249] (port=59202 helo=nut-2.local) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <falk@bbn.com>) id 1PFdjy-0004ok-AJ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:15:18 -0500
Message-ID: <4CD8AEB4.7020300@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 10:15:16 +0800
From: Aaron Falk <falk@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rob Sherwood <rob.sherwood@stanford.edu>
References: <BLU135-W190369C0E27E5EE48D6A7FC84E0@phx.gbl> <AANLkTimQFH_P_6fcGH6fT72TQ+WrQV605QQoBaHm+g-i@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimQFH_P_6fcGH6fT72TQ+WrQV605QQoBaHm+g-i@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: vnrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [vnrg] FlowVisor : A Network Virtualization Layer
X-BeenThere: vnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Virtual Networks Research Group \(VNRG\) discussion list" <vnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/vnrg>
List-Post: <mailto:vnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 02:14:59 -0000
Hi Rob- Glad to see you are on this list. FYI, the research group meeting is scheduled for Friday 0900 - 1130 Beijing time. Meetings are in general audiocast with jabber feedback channels so you are welcome to listen and participate if you'd like. See http://www.ietf.org/meeting/79/remote-participation.html. In fact, modulo the chairs' approval, I believe it is not too late to request agenda time for yourself and webex is available for remote presentation. --aaron On 11/9/10 1:00 AM, Rob Sherwood wrote: > Hello, > > > Apologies that I was not able to attend the working group meeting, but > thanks for the interest on FlowVisor. I flipped through the slides at > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/VNRG-0.pdf > > and at least from the slides (I'm not sure how the > presentation/discussion about these slides went) I think there might > be a few things that need clarification: > > In most of the flowvisor literature, we're very careful to describe > this as "network *slicing*" as opposed to "network virtualization". > The key differences (as brought out in the slides) is that current, > FlowVisor does not support: > > - two slices controlling the same virtual address space (e.g., > 10.0.0.0/24) but the flowvisor rewriting them to different physical > addresses > - network topologies that are independent of the physical topology > (currently FlowVisor is restricted to subsets of the physical > topology) > > Both of these points are limits of the current implementation, but not > of the design, and my thoughts for the future are to take FV towards > implementing these points. > > If anyone is interested in learning more about FlowVisor or its > deployments as part of GENI, please let me know. > > Thanks again for the interest, > > - Rob > . > > > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Guillaume FORTAINE<gfortaine@live.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> For your information : >> -Flowvisor : >> http://www.usenix.org/events/osdi/tech/slides/sherwood.pdf >> http://www.deutsche-telekom-laboratories.de/~robert/flowvisor-osdi10.pdf >> http://www.openflow.org/wk/index.php/FlowVisor >> >> Best Regards, >> Guillaume FORTAINE >> >> _______________________________________________ >> vnrg mailing list >> vnrg@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg >> > _______________________________________________ > vnrg mailing list > vnrg@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg >
- [vnrg] FlowVisor : A Network Virtualization Layer Guillaume FORTAINE
- Re: [vnrg] FlowVisor : A Network Virtualization L… Rob Sherwood
- Re: [vnrg] FlowVisor : A Network Virtualization L… Aaron Falk
- Re: [vnrg] FlowVisor : A Network Virtualization L… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [vnrg] FlowVisor : A Network Virtualization L… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [vnrg] FlowVisor : A Network Virtualization L… Rob Sherwood