[vnrg] comments on draft-shin-virtualization-meta-arch-01

WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com> Fri, 30 April 2010 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
X-Original-To: vnrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB863A69EE for <vnrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.588, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNepnPFqvhG9 for <vnrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta1.huaweisymantec.com (mta1.huaweisymantec.com [218.17.155.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4103A68AE for <vnrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com ([172.26.3.41]) by hstga01-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L1O00F0GISQ9G10@hstga01-in.huaweisymantec.com> for vnrg@irtf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:43:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huaweisymantec.com ([127.0.0.1]) by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L1O00C6GISQA020@hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com> for vnrg@irtf.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:43:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.27.154.72] by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (mshttpd); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:43:38 +0800
From: WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
To: vnrg@irtf.org
Message-id: <fbcdfaa91604.4bdafaaa@huaweisymantec.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:43:38 +0800
X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)
Content-language: en
X-Accept-Language: en
Priority: normal
Subject: [vnrg] comments on draft-shin-virtualization-meta-arch-01
X-BeenThere: vnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Virtual Networks Research Group \(VNRG\) discussion list" <vnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/vnrg>
List-Post: <mailto:vnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:43:58 -0000

Hi,

I review this doc and have some comments as below:

1. In section 1, I think the order of benefits of server virtualization 
should be intuitively corresponded to the order of benefits of  
virtualization described earlier. So, I'd like switch the second bullet
and the third for benefits of server virtualization

for the third bullet for benifits of virtualization, I don't know how
the term 'Encapsulation' related to described easier deployment
and provision benefits. In your ppt presented in IETF77, you use
'abstraction' instead.

2. In section 3, I don't know all the requirements are applied
to isolation VNs or aggregation VNs or both? It might hard to
distinguish these 2 types. E.g., we deployed 3 VNs on top of 
the existing infrastructure in my department, when we consolidate
computing resources from another department with my department,
the 3 VNs could be expanded as well. The isolation and aggregation
VNs co-exist.

3. In section 4, you gave us an example where different service providers
use different VNs, what if users want to use services provided by 
different providers, should they join different VNs (explicitly or implicitly)?

Thanks,
washam