IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [vnrg] Layering vs. virtualization

Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu> Thu, 29 July 2010 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <roland.bless@kit.edu>
X-Original-To: vnrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3709D28C12C for <vnrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2oBJQ6Qcp9B for <vnrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.10.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979573A69A4 for <vnrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.10.5]) by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps port 25 id 1OeOpp-0000sV-HY; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:51:33 +0200
Received: from i72ms.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.70.5] helo=smtp.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de) by irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps port 25 id 1OeOpp-0003N3-Cj; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:51:25 +0200
Received: from vorta.tm.uka.de (i72vorta.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de [IPv6:2001:638:204:6:21b:fcff:fe96:fe02]) by smtp.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5762FC049; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:51:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vorta.tm.uka.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F43A1D6; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:51:25 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C514106.9010404@kit.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:51:18 +0200
From: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Organization: Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Monique Morrow (mmorrow)" <mmorrow@cisco.com>
References: <4C5139C6.9020300@kit.edu> <4C513B95.2080804@tid.es> <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA89500278772A@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA89500278772A@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-AV: Kaspersky (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-Timestamp: iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de 1280393493.329048000
Cc: vnrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [vnrg] Layering vs. virtualization
X-BeenThere: vnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Virtual Networks Research Group \(VNRG\) discussion list" <vnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/vnrg>
List-Post: <mailto:vnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:51:12 -0000

Hi Monique,

On 29.07.2010 10:40, Monique Morrow (mmorrow) wrote:
> Further to layering vs virtualization is the issue of "control"  :
> implication of administrative domains  [inter-domain] -- or is it
> relevant?

IMHO this is highly relevant when considering setting up virtual
links across the substrate of different Infrastructure Provider
(InP) Domains, whereas for setting up virtual nodes it is less
relevant, except for the case when you want to move virtual nodes
between different InP domains.

Regards,
 Roland

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email