[VRRP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5798 (4698)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 19 May 2016 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B69D12B03F for <vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2016 01:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.328
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUcroPAvSBd5 for <vrrp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2016 01:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 070C912B02B for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2016 01:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9E70F180006; Thu, 19 May 2016 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: stephen.nadas@ericsson.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, radia@alum.mit.edu, mukesh@juniper.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160519084333.9E70F180006@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 01:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/vrrp/7AISA6E50KcgaeIcHH49CWAHfJQ>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, vrrp@ietf.org, quentin@armitage.org.uk
Subject: [VRRP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5798 (4698)
X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol <vrrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/vrrp/>
List-Post: <mailto:vrrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 08:43:53 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5798,
"Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Editorial
Reported by: Quentin Armitage <quentin@armitage.org.uk>

Section: 6.4.2

Original Text
(465) * else // preempt was true or priority was less

Corrected Text
(465) * else // preempt was true and priority was less

This is the complement of (445) - If Preempt_Mode is False, or if the Priority ... is greater than or equal to the local priority, and so should be Preempt_Mode is True and the Priority is less than the local priority

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC5798 (draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-05)
Title               : Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6
Publication Date    : March 2010
Author(s)           : S. Nadas, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG