Re: [VRRP] Any known IPv6 VRRPv3 implementation?

"John Cruz (johcruz)" <johcruz@cisco.com> Fri, 15 January 2010 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <johcruz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583E23A6925 for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:46:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id umO0MCbfTzaq for <vrrp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:46:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946EA3A676A for <vrrp@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:46:32 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak4FAMZUUEurR7Hu/2dsb2JhbACCFcNOlRaEMQQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.49,284,1262563200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="233258207"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2010 19:46:29 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0FJkTpP022541; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:46:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-22a.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.81]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:46:29 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA961B.6DD7E793"
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:46:27 -0800
Message-ID: <9D0602B62D632D499E0A26CBCDA74A7D06BE39AD@xmb-sjc-22a.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0A90A9E77DCAA343A585A34B324909510685D9398D@HQ-EXCH-7.corp.brocade.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [VRRP] Any known IPv6 VRRPv3 implementation?
Thread-Index: AcqWGSiTv8eH6eEQRZO8Bdiea5p7cgAAOgOAAABS9fA=
References: <0A90A9E77DCAA343A585A34B324909510685D9398D@HQ-EXCH-7.corp.brocade.com>
From: "John Cruz (johcruz)" <johcruz@cisco.com>
To: Felix Lin <flin@brocade.com>, vrrp@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jan 2010 19:46:29.0733 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E99B150:01CA961B]
Subject: Re: [VRRP] Any known IPv6 VRRPv3 implementation?
X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol <vrrp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vrrp>
List-Post: <mailto:vrrp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp>, <mailto:vrrp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:46:33 -0000

Nokia had an implementation back in 2005.

 

John

 

From: vrrp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vrrp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Felix Lin
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 11:37 AM
To: vrrp@ietf.org
Subject: [VRRP] Any known IPv6 VRRPv3 implementation?

 

Hi,

 

Do anyone know of any IPv6 VRRPv3 implementation currently in the market
?

 

Thanks,

 

Felix