Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 4
Katherine Mancuso <kmancuso@gmail.com> Fri, 25 March 2011 19:14 UTC
Return-Path: <kmancuso@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vwrap@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC08B3A6825 for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JzEvTylaxwqz for <vwrap@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A063A6821 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so994259iwn.31 for <vwrap@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=yZArySozFH8H63kO7lUJ/yVGbcEKT6HoEF4aoorB3Mo=; b=eaZIJoHPWEU763+Ge8m3/KglVfprJqJMdJ/nF/Nz9yxCyrTgxGd1qKtP160du87RR5 TBK4+znPDDFxb3f3gYKN1vazkiGJ0DmITFEYpbhpPCj4Ea2mNNB7vZuJFFjp7rHm0Svs nT61mbn3qZrmwtMto/xArQjRaBr7Gtld/9oAA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; b=VaR4OZc7j7pLCKn2+VhnHv7U+P1POD1MIwnUSSDr0oe86jeqpXqi5VU1RvcimCGpjT K0lb+N6SpmseuW7qoRSn14X6jbxFRjjVm9v1FguAXBfrUFV8Dwyr7YCEA43+Fr8PZfyh Kerpgv8z5Zp9yy+b1aGvBX2nrZYPDEyWERb24=
Received: by 10.42.75.66 with SMTP id z2mr990793icj.235.1301080539174; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.185.145 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.76.1301079617.3073.vwrap@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.76.1301079617.3073.vwrap@ietf.org>
From: Katherine Mancuso <kmancuso@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:15:19 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=5gqZx9sMi=Y64q19xt6-NBYnCJAx96Uo7nuY5@mail.gmail.com>
To: vwrap@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 4
X-BeenThere: vwrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: kmancuso@gmail.com
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <vwrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vwrap>
List-Post: <mailto:vwrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vwrap>, <mailto:vwrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:14:04 -0000
As I've said before, I will continue in my specialist role dealing with accessibility and additionally contribute to polishing drafts (since I'm a writer with a good understanding of technical topics) - but we still need folks who are willing to be software architects and implementers. The other suggestion I have is forget rechartering, go with some of the drafts Meadhbh & Zha and a few others have written, admit that what they did was actually hard and the rest of this group has so far failed to reproduce such an achievement, and use it as a base to move forward and build upon. Internet drafts are basically not set in stone until they become actual RFCs anyway. Katheirne
- Re: [vwrap] vwrap Digest, Vol 11, Issue 4 Katherine Mancuso