IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Next W3C/IETF call scheduling

Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> Wed, 20 February 2013 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <plh@w3.org>
X-Original-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868A921F88E3 for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:44:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.302, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6DlgdpF8nzF for <w3c-policy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB7E21F88A1 for <w3c-policy@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:44:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 30-5-162.wireless.csail.mit.edu ([128.30.5.162] helo=[10.0.2.15]) by jay.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <plh@w3.org>) id 1U8HSg-0001aF-FZ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:44:22 -0500
Message-ID: <1361396658.1788.95.camel@chacal>
Subject: Re: Next W3C/IETF call scheduling
From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:44:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: <512177F4.2060804@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <1360966338.1769.94.camel@chacal> <512177F4.2060804@cs.tcd.ie>
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: W3C/IETF <w3c-policy@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: w3c-policy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Administration of the W3C/IETF liaison <w3c-policy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w3c-policy>
List-Post: <mailto:w3c-policy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/w3c-policy>, <mailto:w3c-policy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:44:23 -0000

On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 00:38 +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Hiya,
> 
> On 02/15/2013 10:12 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> > IETF 86 is approaching and Thomas and I have a list of items (json bof,
> > ipr, http auth, video codec, media types).
> 
> On agenda - could we add drm or whatever is the term-de-jour? I'm
> wondering what's up in w3c there given recent reports related I
> guess to [1].

Sure.

> I'm not so much interested in commenting on developments, more
> in understanding what and perhaps why. If its possible and makes
> sense I'd also be interested in any views as to how that might
> be similar to or different from DNT.

My list now contains
 json bof, ipr, http auth, video, media types, drm, dnt

Philippe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email