status code 425

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 20 July 2010 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <w3c-dist-auth-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-webdav-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-webdav-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312993A68EA for <ietfarch-webdav-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.941, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vVQC7WdvEjb0 for <ietfarch-webdav-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722B03A68EC for <webdav-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <w3c-dist-auth-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ObGMP-0008CC-EO for w3c-dist-auth-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:12:05 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1ObGMO-0008B6-ES for w3c-dist-auth@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:12:04 +0000
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by lisa.w3.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1ObGMM-0004so-4D for w3c-dist-auth@w3.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:12:04 +0000
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2010 17:11:28 -0000
Received: from p508FFD32.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.253.50] by mail.gmx.net (mp070) with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 19:11:28 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19TlXlkn2dTtSsrNT/61OZ2WBESIeb/MGAKwvy7vZ qyoYl4bkw3AR37
Message-ID: <4C45D8B9.6020304@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:11:21 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Received-SPF: pass
X-SPF-Guess: pass
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1ObGMM-0004so-4D 148a242aad11355eb49b4227907510ef
X-Original-To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: status code 425
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/4C45D8B9.6020304@gmx.de>
Resent-From: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org> archive/latest/13290
X-Loop: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Sender: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <w3c-dist-auth.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ObGMP-0008CC-EO@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:12:05 +0000

Hi,

I just found in <http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes>:

> 425       Reserved for WebDAV advanced             [RFC2817]
>           collections expired proposal

RFC 2817 says 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2817.html#rfc.section.7.1>):

 > 3. WebDAV Advanced Collections [5] (Work in Progress) [defines 425]

where [5] is:

>    [5]  Slein, J., Whitehead, E.J., et al., "WebDAV Advanced Collections
>         Protocol",  Work In Progress.

...which of course isn't *that* helpful (RFC Editor, you listening? :-)

Anyway, this seems to come from 
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webdav-collection-protocol-04#section-7.2> 
which says:

> 7.2 425 Unordered Collection
>
>
> The 425 (Unordered Collection) status code indicates that the client
> attempted to set the position of an internal collection member in an
> unordered collection or in a collection with a server-maintained
> ordering.

That draft was never finished, but RFC 3648 ("Web Distributed Authoring 
and Versioning (WebDAV) Ordered Collections Protocol") was. That uses 
the precondition name "DAV:collection-must-be-ordered" instead 
(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3648.html#rfc.section.6.1>).

I don't believe anybody has implemented status code 425.

Maybe we should un-reserve it in the IANA registry?

Best regards, Julian