Re: [webfinger] Server Response language

Goix Laurent Walter <laurentwalter.goix@telecomitalia.it> Thu, 20 December 2012 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <laurentwalter.goix@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33F921F8A78 for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:58:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.240, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mQNJaEg2hOev for <webfinger@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (grfedg702ba020.telecomitalia.it [156.54.233.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BAA21F8A56 for <webfinger@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 09:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_c75c2bc9-3f76-41b5-9293-6b8c05ce8c35_"
Received: from grfhub704ba020.griffon.local (10.188.101.117) by GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (10.188.45.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.5; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:58:24 +0100
Received: from GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local ([10.188.101.15]) by grfhub704ba020.griffon.local ([10.188.101.117]) with mapi; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:58:24 +0100
From: Goix Laurent Walter <laurentwalter.goix@telecomitalia.it>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:58:18 +0100
Thread-Topic: [webfinger] Server Response language
Thread-Index: Ac3e25qWfQnduRUGTKOvhIz1WPQT9Q==
Message-ID: <A2FC82BD-A22C-4063-949B-B9D4671B0245@telecomitalia.it>
References: <044501cddece$fd045040$f70cf0c0$@packetizer.com> <CAHBU6itveCHU+M4A1msr_YQdW9JcrVNmfOmcjFwacLkE-pAYrA@mail.gmail.com> <048401cdded8$605d6c90$211845b0$@packetizer.com> <CAHBU6it45YFr6A+AUm3ub1roXqP99QG4jnEWpbvZew5ejhXt2Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6it45YFr6A+AUm3ub1roXqP99QG4jnEWpbvZew5ejhXt2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-ti-disclaimer: Disclaimer1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>, "webfinger@googlegroups.com" <webfinger@googlegroups.com>, "webfinger@ietf.org" <webfinger@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Server Response language
X-BeenThere: webfinger@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Webfinger protocol proposal in the Applications Area <webfinger.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webfinger>
List-Post: <mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger>, <mailto:webfinger-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:58:29 -0000


Le 20 déc. 2012 à 18:53, "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com<mailto:tbray@textuality.com>> a écrit :

That’s what 404 is for; I quote RFC2616:


10.4.5 404 Not Found

   The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI.

It’s bad practice to incorporate referenced specifications by value not by reference.  -T

Agreed. It's a pity the same was not adopted for jrd ;)

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com<mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>> wrote:
The 404 bit is needed, since the “webfinger” server was found… just not the resource being queried.  That question absolutely will come up.

The new stuff (401, 2xx), I agree: it’s re-stating what HTTP does.

If others agree, I’ll not put that into the spec.

Paul

From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com<mailto:tbray@textuality.com>]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 12:30 PM
To: Paul E. Jones
Cc: webfinger@ietf.org<mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>; webfinger@googlegroups.com<mailto:webfinger@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [webfinger] Server Response language

As in every other case where the WebFinger spec is merely re-iterating standard HTTP rules, I suggest just removing this language. -Tim
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com<mailto:paulej@packetizer.com>> wrote:
Folks,

We had this previously:

“If the client queries the WebFinger server and provides a URI for which the server has no information, the server MUST return a 404 status code.”

Someone posted to the list that we should talk about positive replies and mention that a client might be rejected with a 401.  So, I wrote this text to be appended to the end of that above paragraph:

“If the server is able to provide information in response to a request, it MUST do so using an appropriate 2xx HTTP status code and including the requested representation in the body of the response.  A server MAY also return other HTTP status codes, as appropriate, such as a 401 to indicate that the client is not authorized to issue a request to the server.”

Is this agreeable?  Please suggest wording changes, if not.

Paul



_______________________________________________
webfinger mailing list
webfinger@ietf.org<mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger


_______________________________________________
webfinger mailing list
webfinger@ietf.org<mailto:webfinger@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webfinger
Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.

[cid:00000000000000000000000000000003@TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario.