IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Application server authentication new years edition

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 07 January 2016 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E578C1A8738 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:53:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rjieAtCVOsIE for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:53:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4CED1A8734 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:53:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 1so197338125ion.1 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:53:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KQedWKUWIEI7F4gZ5Zn89mHFrj27yty607D1igxwS8I=; b=gqMXJTGtuujDyKCK3lqp2bnnxr1Pq0UiLtrMrxaaV72uQ2NKsx7HY4e8hTShwiGIji 61CGfEkGmx/CYm6IUhRHnuX+M/ax7QUuFpUypAOF6KKRZSJAHiTVMyGvw2DQl/Zxzafo v+9Ej4+YctTmz++Bpt5ja/FzXyfSJ7tIMM8mmE/mL6pOlA2afsBE4DgmXYrTtJn0vN9t efFJk3h6fMSp4mO+ihsjrCa7t48vFdLZyUwGZGEcSLikGuDSI+y9Io+/gLe9nYuZCZCV 5kOwnO2bEswKcfZOwIeiJ6xAOQ1y9NNCiNhjJLkhYjnNDpnrFfMRPyVyMF+9lT8p2Oko lMlA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.131.40 with SMTP id f40mr86299965iod.190.1452153193437; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:53:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.149.130 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:53:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8-FqkF9X+_CjSyXB10621L0=b756REjXsbRfsL8rT6nuh9pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXBHXfY6Gz-FKGVUUoOwyJo9zaw1rWceSqVp94FypDbJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-Fq=PhUcj5aaE6dvF2_+-HmVrGDyk41QBzkVxiNMxUakoag@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUYkuu9pjuqLDhiWLNWzkr9ZfYRNny4ZvSKRTWie2bQyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-FqnSqtMb5bT14tkycYXOOP+Xmoa9SMjuP5KkeN_ri+_NVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU0CP-fGpEfqLo01ZVdjT3dNVeb3MSufO1P8T2W63dNVw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-FqkF9X+_CjSyXB10621L0=b756REjXsbRfsL8rT6nuh9pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 18:53:13 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW7oRTZRKDQcxf9=0f-mxKfctQQTrR5zY6q4qJtL_cPjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/-9jty6_J6xbkQ3qkwVFtN_UO2Lc>
Cc: Ben Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>, Costin Manolache <costin@google.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Application server authentication new years edition
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 07:53:16 -0000

On 7 January 2016 at 16:43, Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com> wrote:
> That leaves 2.3 only.

It looks like we're mostly in agreement for something like 2.3.
Should I take some time and flesh out the details?  Does anyone
disagree?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email