Re: [Webpush] Message expiration (TTL) and Negative Acknowledgements

Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> Tue, 13 October 2015 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7B61A90B7 for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPxIIx1U-YYE for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0136.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0921A90B4 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=O6HD58rmZBGeCYykG/TQ1YWBtueItPwvWYLaTHasRX0=; b=eQ+oQhUkSkwXv6xB7KTgPRqepX72kpNRTt7SEVK9yKyjzrG1n2IKg7ecxKzVQS5+9hRD16f0OFWLlmkHKaFBjikBLEP9oSGtRiSNY1t5VLq/oGTNDLY8gSHRngQW85knbVrKiRn6JxOwQU/6nE67mo7VUhkVKiHJXMlnnRIn3Ok=
Received: from BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.14) by BY2PR0301MB0648.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.63.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.293.16; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:39:16 +0000
Received: from BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.63.14]) by BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.63.14]) with mapi id 15.01.0293.007; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:39:16 +0000
From: Brian Raymor <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
To: "Martin Thomson (martin.thomson@gmail.com)" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Webpush] Message expiration (TTL) and Negative Acknowledgements
Thread-Index: AdEGA6AApJ25A8bWSta9W/kXIcP8NQAAOC8AAABNKHAAAaYIAAAAW6Ug
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:39:15 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR0301MB06477831319E03BE225AABD183300@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BY2PR0301MB0647111FCF5845E3AA0C244583300@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnUs_S6aRpTi6H5+d4xpuU1+2G1OKmWCxzczk+DYDWZGSQ@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR0301MB0647EAE2174E1103EF59A2A083300@BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnUOcuK6p2C5WDaS==nwcYMfnpu1jXKj8oo31css7CFJNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUOcuK6p2C5WDaS==nwcYMfnpu1jXKj8oo31css7CFJNg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8::676]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0301MB0648; 5:8u99kQ2fKZs5sbJL0g3qXeyMoyahl70Af1ryVfKmzay2p8wnjUjSCCJ6Avl0RqbOOfVh35O0taUxOa1ljbgQOCvjTqtp5qKWnjkoUacLyo4+s9b4pJT35Iocan8Y5X8SgjsCHkjq1Tsvp+HKJemoQQ==; 24:F4Jt7igsfS8alZ96hGxjBdOBqx5TPcRIoedLFTFG53imvGXRyfgxLpXr2kJhBGBfJCqiyRhZpq6l3Hr3YJRY7N6YSR6rmk9pqF8dZx9GzwQ=; 20:2wgqLflg8rcqV0zL0jr5XU3hsgqLoJXGhAOml0bqJkQgNPJHXeTp4OkwXuzqGGQYDwn0I8/2kzk8O8MpUFh32w==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0648;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR0301MB06480B3EE9F07084BF3DC2F783300@BY2PR0301MB0648.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425024)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(520078)(5005006)(3002001)(61426024)(61427024); SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0648; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0648;
x-forefront-prvs: 07283408BE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(377454003)(31014005)(24454002)(189002)(54356999)(50986999)(76176999)(97736004)(33656002)(101416001)(86612001)(86362001)(5008740100001)(5003600100002)(5002640100001)(64706001)(87936001)(81156007)(2950100001)(5007970100001)(76576001)(110136002)(5004730100002)(189998001)(5001960100002)(2900100001)(8990500004)(10290500002)(10400500002)(5005710100001)(92566002)(11100500001)(10090500001)(46102003)(77096005)(99286002)(15975445007)(102836002)(93886004)(40100003)(19580395003)(19580405001)(106356001)(105586002)(122556002)(74316001)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0648; H:BY2PR0301MB0647.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Oct 2015 23:39:15.9232 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0301MB0648
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/-UZTM_XiAGSjyZHBid7kliZeIwo>
Cc: "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Message expiration (TTL) and Negative Acknowledgements
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:39:22 -0000

On October 13 2015 at 4:10 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> WFM.  Now, if only we could decide on what that 5xx might be (or was
> your intent to follow-up with a mail on that subject.)

Next on my list ...

I've created a pull request - https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/48 - to address:

https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/17
https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/18

I've separated the 5XX status code into a new issue - https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/issues/49

...Brian