IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webpush] Vapid public key

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 04 November 2016 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0C21293FE for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3egsJ5CEdc7g for <webpush@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E0F12007C for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id x190so80911502qkb.0 for <webpush@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 20:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VgT/jPq5GgZIvoBT3lhVC5fNvYC4ixb0oXkTthuxtbI=; b=UxMRpwe9Dyb89+JaLA8pxAe1Fnc4r6rDdTZiYTYxNAKb2hpY5g4CYJpPH0GJu+T9Vf URsx89sAVFxPzo6VkdNhBVCCfXwBPFH6ip+M9pYWW1J7itBv1D2uJGbrEz5WMEbEdERy zlxLZo6JNGRSfkvcKT3/SDs7MPCxJY6R8QleOCJXhcdOf6rwpNLlCiojgjQiCSX2aX46 a9tj2D73scFNWBJ6O8NDneQeH6/rn8oxAqIs6QAs9Rw2bsxNYK68N/8N3CMpFsNc79PX Dgx+5JeWflXcFWKd0WvxAnz8msRVyiZ8DAlNJtDoiHWe5jdQEhp/SmrDSNGoGITET/Xi Q8yQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VgT/jPq5GgZIvoBT3lhVC5fNvYC4ixb0oXkTthuxtbI=; b=dMpuqWMKQT0vUqNgJpozHcuiWxOAgeCeXQEYdPUBlF6+mfjWcqvjfLOWkoMNwZF64H hqh2gL68RuO/pMZXoaODe81SOVY2e+U8xPa4Gb903CZKCD38ZybRm60zSKHebeRrw4K5 HpT+lwbGtzAFgWjuf7Tflmzli5INpHzoPZFlq2olxEEVnqAo41SPCqXuMZw9dzx5ud33 CK8XOoRiethMW8exrzf5hlKNyZVYMRbnOYszwMTZKfN98ID/iDKihg5/Onu19OHrAswV PfmNCq11Nwb2Tn95SbeHwmM7qud9XkJh9bXlOlwAnECVLaR/eyu55tGeauB0V4VUVArt HcQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvejEY/TsM1L0oEwP/EFa+msKZqnG2FslSiAk3/71pc1UmUbq3UQTSAApHW98RNj/fJnJoZBXd/T9Zjvug==
X-Received: by 10.233.235.72 with SMTP id b69mr12394593qkg.144.1478228986440; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 20:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.85.7 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnX8bmzsmx0EGJ8h5R4k4i=3KBaLXucekyv98PTz01f9fw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnVKd+kAZPD5KirF7NaGMDBSpaO6FR3yE8d+c3ge3-He3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-FqmBUHd5up7Jfo+veFWvL22XiPwGGXNnOW6rm7nxeESU_g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX4aAjnZyu3morJOLatuuj9k4NSoTpoNtF7YjtRUFQOnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP8-Fq=Zd66ZhWm+gYesOpc2NZ-YBpy2+bHdr6O+h1KG2s16uw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX8bmzsmx0EGJ8h5R4k4i=3KBaLXucekyv98PTz01f9fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:09:45 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVvVHMFrbJYgF9GZEumDhvM_kHBf30TdHWxzSzpX1_CTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Costin Manolache <costin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webpush/QNldokYszWpmgu9lc2lW_KHLFUI>
Cc: jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>, "webpush@ietf.org" <webpush@ietf.org>, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Webpush] Vapid public key
X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol <webpush.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webpush/>
List-Post: <mailto:webpush@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush>, <mailto:webpush-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 03:09:49 -0000

On 3 November 2016 at 11:56, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> I could live with either.  The second form is recommended by RFC 7235,
> so we should probably pick that one.  That said, it makes sniffing
> marginally harder because the double-quotes are optional and '=' is
> valid in either form.  You have to look for a comma.

Here's the proposed changes:

https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-vapid/pull/29

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email