Re: [websec] WEBSEC and The Need for More Than DNSSEC
Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Mon, 01 November 2010 20:54 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: websec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DDE3A6A79 for <websec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.577, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z3a8p4Ph9Nr2 for <websec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028B13A6A75 for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws3 with SMTP id 3so4175626vws.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.179.70 with SMTP id bp6mr8617486qab.364.1288644849883; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s34sm5397209qcp.8.2010.11.01.13.54.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so7923686iwn.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.36.77 with SMTP id s13mr13973255ibd.190.1288644845682; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.158.139 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C8F47515.21DA%thassloc@adobe.com>
References: <4CC715FA.9040602@extendedsubset.com> <C8F47515.21DA%thassloc@adobe.com>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:53:35 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimH2ixAx3oX6VH6fSAMpGzPA6r7f8TF6=A7XE9E@mail.gmail.com>
To: Travis Hassloch <thassloc@adobe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Sam Caldwell <mail@samcaldwell.net>, "websec@ietf.org" <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] WEBSEC and The Need for More Than DNSSEC
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:54:08 -0000
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Travis Hassloch <thassloc@adobe.com> wrote: > BTW, Barth, typo: > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?draft=draft-abarth-origin > The first instance of "principal" lacks an r. Yeah, that one is pretty embarrassing. I've fixed it locally. Thanks. Adam
- [websec] WEBSEC and The Need for More Than DNSSEC Sam Caldwell
- Re: [websec] WEBSEC and The Need for More Than DN… Marsh Ray
- Re: [websec] WEBSEC and The Need for More Than DN… =JeffH
- Re: [websec] WEBSEC and The Need for More Than DN… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [websec] WEBSEC and The Need for More Than DN… Travis Hassloch
- Re: [websec] WEBSEC and The Need for More Than DN… Adam Barth