[websec] #2: Effective Request URI definition dependency on HTTPbis spec ?
"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 08 July 2011 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EF811E8071 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sY4K2HhPT1PM for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65B89E8004 for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1QfJ6S-0005Q9-FJ; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:00:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: websec issue tracker <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:00:52 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/2
Message-ID: <070.635a7e567ddf1f9f8a84288abf1b42d3@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 2
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:19:18 -0700
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: [websec] #2: Effective Request URI definition dependency on HTTPbis spec ?
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:00:53 -0000
#2: Effective Request URI definition dependency on HTTPbis spec ?
Should we have an explicit normative dependency on the HTTPbis spec
(Internet-drafts, advancement to RFC timeframe uncertain) for the
definition of Effective Request URI ?
Note: there is another ticket in case the answer to this question is "no",
stipulating that we need to copy the ERU text from the httpbis I-D.
--
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: jeff.hodges@… | Owner: =JeffH
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: strict-transport-sec | Version:
Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords:
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/2>
websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>
- [websec] #2: Effective Request URI definition dep… websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #2: Effective Request URI definition… websec issue tracker