IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] pinning specs

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 15 November 2011 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F1911E80E6 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:44:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Om-bBRcY1hzL for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A8011E80DD for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:43:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from squire.local (unknown [61.31.89.133]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 158F34214E; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:50:09 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EC2DD19.2040003@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:43:53 +0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
References: <4EC2D2DF.8050206@stpeter.im> <CAOuvq21OoaZmEiaQGqMA9MAngViVP0s-O5_urMrx2DOXc2y6kA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOuvq21OoaZmEiaQGqMA9MAngViVP0s-O5_urMrx2DOXc2y6kA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] pinning specs
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:44:01 -0000

On 11/16/11 5:41 AM, Chris Palmer wrote:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-evans-palmer-key-pinning/
>>
>> and
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-evans-palmer-hsts-pinning/
>>
>> Jeff's slides refer to the former. Are both of these documents in play?
> 
> No, the former is the real one. It responds to the helpful critiques
> we got from everyone when we submitted the latter. It is no longer
> piggy-backing on the HSTS header, so I gave the draft a new, more
> accurate name.
> 
> You can safely disregard the latter.

OK. I'll send an email message to ietf-action@ietf.org explaining that
draft-evans-palmer-key-pinning replaces draft-evans-palmer-hsts-pinning
(as a result of which the Secretariat will effectively deprecate the
latter).

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email