[websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax redux
=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Thu, 27 October 2011 18:03 UTC
Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F2021F8B06 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y3CIUQRNEKg7 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy5.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C79DC21F88A0 for <websec@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 26010 invoked by uid 0); 27 Oct 2011 18:03:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2011 18:03:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kingsmountain.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=WBfB0bC0ackUqwbsDXBWdqdMJ9pru9J3h5Kw3I2Ot2o=; b=irjLqUVNEZjmOhOIWOUI8HM7Pv1C70Ajtw63vkvcACK2R0gNJtI+oOXUSyNkIEQBmvL9EOoj+fmMlcpISQDGWgS8eQKrQcuzSjxwD6jR2V8n9aTuztaPxApkJYgERjx1;
Received: from c-24-4-122-173.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([24.4.122.173] helo=[192.168.11.18]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1RJUIn-0000kE-6d; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:03:41 -0600
Message-ID: <4EA99CFB.30801@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:03:39 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietfhasmat@sleevi.com>, IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.4.122.173 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Subject: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax redux
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:03:42 -0000
I've been working with Julian on simplifying the STS header field syntax. Here's where it's presently at -- thoughts? thanks again to Julian and Ryan for their earlier feedback. =JeffH ### 5.1. Strict-Transport-Security HTTP Response Header Field The Strict-Transport-Security HTTP response header field indicates to a UA that it MUST enforce the HSTS Policy in regards to the host emitting the response message containing this header field. Note: this specification uses the augmented BNF (ABNF) notation from Section 2 of [RFC2616], including its rules for "implied linear whitespace (LWS)", and case-insensitivity of quoted-string literals. The ABNF syntax for the Strict-Transport-Security (STS) HTTP Response Header field is: Strict-Transport-Security = "Strict-Transport-Security" ":" directive *( ";" [ directive ] ) STS directives: directive = max-age | includeSubDomains | STS-d-ext max-age = "max-age" "=" delta-seconds includeSubDomains = "includeSubDomains" The max-age directive MUST appear once in the Strict-Transport-Security header field value. The includeSubDomains directive MAY appear once. The order of appearance of directives in the Strict-Transport-Security header field value is not significant. Additional directives extending the the semantic functionality of the Strict-Transport-Security header field may be defined in other specifications, using the STS directive extension point (STS-d-ext) syntax: STS-d-ext = token [ "=" ( token | quoted-string ) ] Defined in [RFC2616]: delta-seconds = <1*DIGIT, defined in [RFC2616], Section 3.3.2> token = <token, defined in [RFC2616], Section 2.2> quoted-string = <quoted-string, defined in [RFC2616], Section 2.2> ###
- [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax redux Ryan Sleevi
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… =JeffH
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax redux =JeffH
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… =JeffH
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… =JeffH
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… =JeffH
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Marsh Ray
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Julian Reschke
- Re: [websec] Strict-Transport-Security syntax red… Bjoern Hoehrmann