[websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-11
=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Tue, 10 July 2012 23:24 UTC
Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D32711E80E0 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x+YxZp9EMtoC for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy7.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B4A1811E80A3 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30357 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jul 2012 23:24:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by oproxy7.bluehost.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2012 23:24:33 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kingsmountain.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=n4tROl85lFIh2oPhKbmxKhAJX0SxYnsmdPI2ShsiwTY=; b=ccI49S5U7YkIiqVNrJRU5sfs0viOI+gPgiOUO8LZXVfPYSCwzDRtzkAP6i0TjLX7hKPRjLn3q0tjGGsRIoa+x/GIbBkN+Z9uKMBpved9BPqj2wqtNWAMh3hHtQCNQBtd;
Received: from [216.113.168.128] (port=44862 helo=[10.244.137.22]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1SojnF-00051c-1X for websec@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:24:33 -0600
Message-ID: <4FFCB9B0.1030906@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:24:32 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth 216.113.168.128 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Subject: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-11
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:24:05 -0000
New rev: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-11 full issue ticket list for strict-transport-sec: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/query?status=assigned&status=closed&status=new&status=reopened&component=strict-transport-sec&order=id> Redline spec diff from previous rev: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-11.txt side-by-side diff from previous rev: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-11.txt All issue tickets are now closed. Change Log for this rev is below. =JeffH ============================================================== Appendix D. Change Log [RFCEditor: please remove this section upon publication as an RFC.] Changes are grouped by spec revision listed in reverse issuance order. D.1. For draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec Changes from -10 to -11: 1. Various minor editorial fixes based on Barry Leiba's AD review, as well as ID-Nits warnings. 2. Clarification addition of directive-name and directive-value to Strict-Transport-Security ABNF in Section 6.1, from Barry's AD review. <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/ current/msg01265.html> 3. Moved ref to RFC5894 to Informational since it is a truly informational reference. Changes from -09 to -10: <snip/> --- end