[websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7469 (7480)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 28 April 2023 12:07 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D846C151B1F for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 05:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eaPONYZQ0Gif for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 05:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F506C151544 for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 05:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 49B1555D5E; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 05:07:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: cevans@google.com, palmer@google.com, sleevi@google.com, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com, websec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230428120738.49B1555D5E@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 05:07:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/PiJF94L0CZI_Sd6Tkh_rjGaYWmY>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 May 2023 08:38:03 -0700
Subject: [websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7469 (7480)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 12:07:42 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7469, "Public Key Pinning Extension for HTTP". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7480 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Rajeev Kumar Surroach <rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com> Section: 7469 Original Text ------------- 7469 Corrected Text -------------- 7469 Notes ----- Solve the issue Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7469 (draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Public Key Pinning Extension for HTTP Publication Date : April 2015 Author(s) : C. Evans, C. Palmer, R. Sleevi Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Security Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7469 (748… RFC Errata System