IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Sat, 17 August 2013 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA7111E821A for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -95.361
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.361 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id soBxSYcOVyDp for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lvps176-28-13-69.dedicated.hosteurope.de (lvps176-28-13-69.dedicated.hosteurope.de [176.28.13.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CE411E8218 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=CGuo670Mmsa75cu5EBznXVYvmxSZCSq37x+Y1uBCvYOBq6uQpaZcfFo3XgcUiQCX4gfL6dNcoiUX9j3nRzGVWf+K3ojst/dcXn4N8JLXjfkFmvCMzW/O0SFoPN4sQeb1; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type;
Received: (qmail 21710 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2013 20:57:35 +0200
Received: from 188-222-103-191.zone13.bethere.co.uk (HELO ?192.168.1.64?) (188.222.103.191) by lvps176-28-13-69.dedicated.hosteurope.de with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 17 Aug 2013 20:57:35 +0200
Message-ID: <520FC79E.9090201@gondrom.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 19:57:34 +0100
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: barryleiba@computer.org
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
References: <20130814221250.16821.99472.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJLqwULZc1rxbXaxYRz+hTE5Z3S42F2+LDHVaj_CdivfKg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLqwULZc1rxbXaxYRz+hTE5Z3S42F2+LDHVaj_CdivfKg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090107090507030705060607"
Cc: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options@tools.ietf.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, websec@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, websec-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] Pete Resnick's No Objection on draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 18:57:46 -0000

On 14/08/13 23:15, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> Why is this document not on the standards track?
> Because it's not anything we want to tell people to start implementing
> now.  We want them to move toward the work we transferred over to
> W3C's WebAppSec group instead.
>
> b
> _______________________________________________
> websec mailing list
> websec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec

Barry is correct.

Best regards, Tobias

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email