Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age
"websec issue tracker" <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 22 March 2013 21:39 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272A921F9469 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sq97bURtwJ7U for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5D021F9465 for <websec@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38936 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1UJ9gp-00006M-IE; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:39:55 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: websec issue tracker <trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: palmer@google.com
X-Trac-Project: websec
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:39:55 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/websec/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/57#comment:1
Message-ID: <073.92e203ac2ffbca6a9b6ecd285f8d0e00@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <058.4066f40ba1a0e0b17085c25af1721605@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 57
In-Reply-To: <058.4066f40ba1a0e0b17085c25af1721605@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: palmer@google.com, sleevi@google.com, websec@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+websec@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: websec@ietf.org, sleevi@google.com
Subject: Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:39:58 -0000
#57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Comment (by palmer@google.com): Rather, it was decided that there should be implementation guidance for setting an upper limit, including discussing the security considerations /trade-offs of high vs. low maximum max-age values. -- --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: palmer@google.com | Owner: palmer@google.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: key-pinning | Version: Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: Keywords: | --------------------------------+-------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/57#comment:1> websec <http://tools.ietf.org/websec/>
- [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age websec issue tracker
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Trevor Perrin
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Joseph Bonneau
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Yoav Nir
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Trevor Perrin
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Chris Palmer
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Joseph Bonneau
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Yoav Nir
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Joseph Bonneau
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Yoav Nir
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Yoav Nir
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Ryan Sleevi
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Trevor Perrin
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Yoav Nir
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age Trevor Perrin
- Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age websec issue tracker