[websec] Is sniffing a heuristic? (was Re: more on sniffing)
Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Sun, 08 January 2012 21:03 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C0E21F8602 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:03:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XUvL9fKKYQJw for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E72F21F85FA for <websec@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so6298469iab.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.156.130 with SMTP id we2mr16239835igb.10.1326056638140; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 36sm242480853ibc.6.2012.01.08.13.03.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:03:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so6298448iab.31 for <websec@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:03:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.47.136 with SMTP id d8mr16299795ign.21.1326056637140; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:03:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.62.139 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:03:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:03:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJE5ia8dVwtr5Qe3DqyrDiFk7B0_3nEJD50=RewXK5RbB37LMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "IETF WebSec WG (websec@ietf.org)" <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: [websec] Is sniffing a heuristic? (was Re: more on sniffing)
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:03:59 -0000
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote: >> <t>Sniffing is by its nature a heuristic process, because there are >> many situations where content matches the signatures and capabilities >> of many different possible content-type values. > > I disagree with this statement as well. The sniffing we're talking > about here is not a heuristic. It's a historical anomaly that needs > to be corrected for in order for user agents to be compatible with > some web sites. Let me expand this point some more. Does you view the HTML5 parsing algorithm a heuristic? The sniffing algorithm is the same sort of thing as the HTML5 parsing algorithm in that it's a somewhat unpleasant algorithm for interpreting responses from servers that's compatible with existing deployments. Adam
- [websec] Is sniffing a heuristic? (was Re: more o… Adam Barth
- Re: [websec] Is sniffing a heuristic? (was Re: mo… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [websec] Is sniffing a heuristic? (was Re: mo… Gervase Markham
- Re: [websec] Is sniffing a heuristic? (was Re: mo… SM