IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webtransport] Choosing the Transport, pt. 2

Luke Curley <kixelated@gmail.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <kixelated@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62033A09F2 for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITImh-J8a3eA for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com (mail-oi1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 536F23A1034 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id k27so3240781oij.11 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iZ+vS0pDQ8TDiuewpD4Otc1nh0MdXXgquwn1B78bBfM=; b=Aaq96zIyvaeFN3Tn66aSBg1GaUgriD1iwLOJJsxEzlklw2QyaEGtdxihjuFXfFg1NG +l5uSHvlETj7unmKqDMDHyH/8ZiY43V3d1G5YhBZodwqCmDCdef8KnQiXVRAbCrDzP9r caIVhwaJeJez9yvTpbD/G/0f/fO9VitCOoIuU9hNT49jwxb+fvGnuB6dCz+lgWyxhBz4 vnnMUZ608U1KxcLt6DCryC5LbB5folnqkxIVfdeZihYNzsn5rQaaXEnUB4WxjmVgKQ67 0K4//kdljN2G7VpC09NDlvpZYVrwaa79oZGDxV1P+0cCRhnUE7gpbFTHj9sYmh4/75EO SmLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iZ+vS0pDQ8TDiuewpD4Otc1nh0MdXXgquwn1B78bBfM=; b=lBoRAClAcegGET+NI98j5/52GvB+1GALhRrM6QhaexPk5hhhTEzBRG1cg5pzhBY+mw FyI6puT2bwIPCqax8a9m1TeoNEk4QaDcEC4uousaTg5pPMy016klfEW7oSnZhsJRIuOv JrQs3YOk+aMAOe0qjf6xMvIokLMrb4qw2gf9x+PeIVRxfeWbtH4XHUaX5Uh61tLjTimn muEL1BYgN9gbSRzt04s2Rk/Zpz8lvR2vIpJDI5ApY6NnxEn0V2Gc92gdthlNFGaWb14q FmgVQUFXV7WQHyIKenxz5EywcluTz1sAc0Jc33D1FzcZgTVc3fdork3P8y13dKZk4AUS p05Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WUEKvR8KiFBR8yuw9NRBwKpcU0ePfz44NvEWNdbzwLow2aucm HMsSVexA+fOyrOzOk+cG1qdKtG2WTMz3XtvFsJU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAuZTfngPusgHCAFGHOR0uBVKtMXuE6q45xsnfdQZ/B9lnsvTiMjFdIgj/+q28YzGlQCFYVGBdbWacWoVoxHM=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:2b05:: with SMTP id i5mr3557248oik.57.1603845253585; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAZdMafdbwusA3Ks_k=RW9FXCh+OMj90Y_7A7Pj5cBHTXgyQPA@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oYHka0qQYkAQAj7omX9koGsgy4VyHt-irBAZC=9ygvZ8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oYHka0qQYkAQAj7omX9koGsgy4VyHt-irBAZC=9ygvZ8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Luke Curley <kixelated@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:34:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHVo=ZmV99mg=bb43JrWga19tHKJQF29xCgowQVFBtUvBTDd_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Cc: Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, WebTransport <webtransport@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009d5ebc05b2b0529c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/L__ZKr2v6ystgnneWDC26L0UP3k>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Choosing the Transport, pt. 2
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:35:23 -0000

Yeah, I definitely agree that there's a grey area between QuicTransport and
Http3Transport. The QuicTransport indication is similar to HTTP, while
HttpTransport behaves like QUIC.

But I think the decision to implement multiple protocols needs to be more
objective. Every WebTransport variant should add functionality or provide
backwards compatibility. Otherwise we'll be defining and implementing
standards that serve no purpose.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 9:50 AM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hey Victor,
>
> Thanks for the update. I reviewed the QuicTransport changes in the PR you
> linked and the similarity to HTTP was striking, so it's good that you call
> this out.
>
> I wonder what Http3Transport looks like now. Have you done that update?
>
> For me, it would help to understand what the drafts look like in this new
> model before considering what is adoption worthy. Maybe its simple but my
> imagination is lacking right now.
>
> Cheers
> Lucas
>
>
>
>> --
> Webtransport mailing list
> Webtransport@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email