[weirds] Adding missing RDAP event action types for gTLDs

Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org> Tue, 10 November 2015 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F6E1B3C71; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:29:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TBao75qazol7; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:29:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27A7E1B3C6E; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:29:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:29:22 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:29:22 -0800
From: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
To: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Adding missing RDAP event action types for gTLDs
Thread-Index: AQHRG+W3Qkw2SFOjD0GXFX7C2VCvSQ==
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:29:21 +0000
Message-ID: <D267777A.C98D5%gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.7.151005
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.35.2]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="B_3529996154_9293738"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/Ai2lGhhd4SgtxGFmd3WVa8MQRM8>
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: [weirds] Adding missing RDAP event action types for gTLDs
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:29:26 -0000

Hello colleagues,

As you may know, two of the open issues in the RDAP profile for gTLDs
(http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/attachments/20150928/35901409/gTLDR
DAPOperationalProfile-v06-0001.pdf) are missing event action types in the
base RDAP specification for:
* Last update time of the RDAP database
* Registrar registration expiration date

You may find the details in the following I-D:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-lozano-rdap-gtld-whois-additional-events-00.tx
t

It's important to promptly add these two event action types based on the
timeline for deployment of RDAP in the gTLDs.

As this appears to be a minor update, I am planning (in the last week of
November) on sending a request to IANA, in order to add these two action
event types to the RDAP JSON Values Registry following the Expert Review
Registration Procedure. I would like to get feedback from the list regarding
this proposal. 

If you agree with the proposal, it would be great if you can reply to the
list in order to show the expert reviewer that there is consensus on the
list.

Regards,
Gustavo