Re: [weirds] Question: Nameserver data looked up by IP address

Naoki Kambe <kambe@jprs.co.jp> Wed, 05 February 2014 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <kambe@jprs.co.jp>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8731F1A0190 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:27:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RANDOM_SURE=0.499, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fGCqmz528dQm for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:27:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-send01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (off-send01.tyo.jprs.co.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:8:17::10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323AE1A016C for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:27:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-sendsmg01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (off-sendsmg01.tyo.jprs.co.jp [172.18.8.32]) by off-send01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s151RDxH018612 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:27:14 +0900
X-AuditID: ac120820-b7f196d00000167f-df-52f19371b9f0
Received: from localhost (off-cpu04.tyo.jprs.co.jp [172.18.4.14]) by off-sendsmg01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id C7.9B.05759.17391F25; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:27:13 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:27:00 +0900
Message-Id: <20140205.102700.267973128.kambe@jprs.co.jp>
To: weirds@ietf.org
From: Naoki Kambe <kambe@jprs.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4933EE5D@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4933E628@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <CF156CF6.2C277%andy@arin.net> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4933EE5D@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Organization: Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2.52 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWyRoiFT7do8scgg01TmCzmdx1ncWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxoTfU1gKzjBXtNzUbmD8xdTFyMEhIWAi8W6ZbhcjJ5ApJnHh 3nq2LkYuDiGBk4wSC1edYAdJsAhoS7zdtZARxOYVsJA4MfcZWFxEQFhi8ct3LCBzhAXcJXYv 0QcJswmoSCy7t5kJxOYUCJfYtO4/I8TMI4wSG76+Zgep5xfQl5jalAKx106i6S/EGF4BQYm/ O4RBwswCWhI9Mx6zQ9jyEtvfzmGewMg/C6FqFpKqWUiqFjAyr2KUyU9L0y1OzUspzk03MNQr qczXyyooKtZLBtGbGMHhxqGwg3HGKYNDjAIcjEo8vNNEPwYJsSaWFVfmHmKU5GBSEuV9OwEo xJeUn1KZkVicEV9UmpNafIhRgoNZSYQ3sRsox5uSWFmVWpQPk5LmYFES5z3+50ygkEB6Yklq dmpqQWoRTFaGg0NJgvfHRKBGwaLU9NSKtMycEoQ0EwcnyHAeoOFak0CGFxck5hZnpkPkTzFK SonzPgNpFgBJZJTmwfW+YhQHekGYVwikjQeYOuC6XgENZAIauM71PcjAkkSElFQDY9fxGXci cs0jlG6tu5hjlZduH6O/u0QopdPuq4DJosvV2Ue/X7G53prudSM81eC9SpuIdKOLxYOl0xZe uLBwz7SrVdtb11QmWk5/c06z4oDJdrfHXHob01Kqz3/r/uR7q1C79Ir/0tPyF2YYhL1PPfDz ppdflUbES3G7ltjthmbGYhrPEmczKrEUZyQaajEXFScCAOT4qCjaAgAA
Subject: Re: [weirds] Question: Nameserver data looked up by IP address
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 01:27:16 -0000

From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:15:37 +0000
> I just submitted rdap-query-10 with additional text to include name server search by IP address.

Thank you for submitting but I have a simple question.
What if querying this with a wild card? For example,

 /nameservers&ip=192.0.2.*
 /nameservers&ip=2001:db8::*

Although these formats don't exactly conform to RFC1166 or RFC5952.
Regards,

Naoki Kambe