Re: [weirds] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7483 (4503)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 21 January 2016 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D9A1B30F9 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:12:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yMMxLl57oBMU for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D7101B3105 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x229.google.com with SMTP id t15so125158092igr.0 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:12:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Glex15APxWiOEMQyllSn+s158S8ae89rAStwp8ZBjcQ=; b=HIYFU5b+Yu68yy2OPodRNGJgXpM+DyzLkYbvsy6HcB+AON0sOSmzdjfBl8EONpnOPz CTqfg9MY7GsoWjENfZBZq4YreFxTPEoyl0AQPG5dnoWI6ApMRbQdeI4KxONz3f/K8tq4 JA5gG/r/RgqaIhElO4TF3POnh7qtbRI9VE/naolylc9O//kWHr+gve7Tf/aWhWD4/bOb yUbf0i9+/ZYwWPNiN2l8gl9w9EOJodJCvkLyC9QGIRG7VWtBo+dRyuhklyPgFFakLNq1 8eDtK8XheDDFRKVswvZcEe7vmRqUj7kfINriG1Ylgtfu6ZS2ioB6pd0k6UFM2oZdpWku p/6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Glex15APxWiOEMQyllSn+s158S8ae89rAStwp8ZBjcQ=; b=HWv4SkGbMYTCMoC/TGTZhXmZ+X6qO0Wh7k+0HVsEZMoJ32KGQuwToq05inqx2uHchD 6jMWR+7wYwBazdpa5pw1HV5B3Jd/fBwFTmgcsx2CwlucFv5f7ofRL7101d78hrWTxR8N 2oDZnvJbgnMHoZLyDcwWd54DkKg9vGN3XLvWd9mTX11Tp9Nq0icXcEPbpPMM0OzzyNws mgv4SMoQaiZP27GT//qnAmLpxL33rZ8L2faOqpNNQsdJ0ilBqq3BKrTd6s1hSvFS08oH IQmma9yNZELsiGGwvwCYiyhXStU9j+0R+Hu92OaxNCvAS0JsZsb8MfyQhRwoXVbBXSCh 1r2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOStVzVZm6PAUlsNilGGRuUlNYgniNNfNtTIVhJPVkBq6edduKI//8e5tMN3HEq4qqjiG9MioL3d40c9JQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.138.5 with SMTP id qm5mr9861863igb.53.1453381969718; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:12:49 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.36.117.3 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 05:12:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151014145826.EB9F218046A@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20151014145826.EB9F218046A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:12:49 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GmPGQBmLlyKCjlMcSj8_ndRpDmk
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+KTbQudmdkoZ59o=eGHo+mUjxct_zYY8qU27ZaWYCzVg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/T5-23Es3Lp_nhEe91vJKGuhyM-E>
Cc: olaf@nlnetlabs.nl, "weirds@ietf.org Group" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7483 (4503)
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 13:12:51 -0000

As I've seen no responses to this three-month-old errata report, and
as it was posted by an author, I'm going to mark it "Verified".  RFC
Editor: When I do that, will you please go in and correct the
multiple-backslash problem (which I understand is a tooling issue)?
Thanks,

Barry

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:58 AM, RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7483,
> "JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7483&eid=4503
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
>
> Section: 5.2 and 5.3
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> In Section 5.2:
>
> \\"ldhName\\" : \\"ns1.xn--fo-5ja.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"ns1.foo.example\\",
>
> In Section 5.3:
>
> \\"ldhName\\" : \\"xn--fo-5ja.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"foo.example\\",
>
> \\"ldhName\\" : \\"xn--fo-cka.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"foo.example\\"
>
> \\"ldhName\\" : \\"xn--fo-fka.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"foo.example\\"
>
> \\"ldhName\\": \\"xn--fo-8ja.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"foo.example\\"
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> In Section 5.2:
>
> \\"ldhName\\" : \\"ns1.xn--fo-5ja.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"ns1.fóo.example\\",
>
> In Section 5.3:
>
> \\"ldhName\\" : \\"xn--fo-5ja.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"fóo.example\\",
>
> \\"ldhName\\" : \\"xn--fo-cka.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"fõo.example\\"
>
> \\"ldhName\\" : \\"xn--fo-fka.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"föo.example\\"
>
> \\"ldhName\\" : \\"xn--fo-8ja.example\\",
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"fôo.example\\"
>
> Notes
> -----
> The unicodeName examples in RFC 7483 are invalid per RFC 5890. Here\\'s an example from Section 5.2 on page 23:
>
> \\"unicodeName\\" : \\"ns1.foo.example\\",
>
> Section 3 of 7483 says this about Unicode names:
>
> \\"Unicode names: Textual representations of DNS names where one or more of the labels are U-labels as described by [RFC5890].\\"
>
> 5890 says: \\"A \\"U-label\\" is an IDNA-valid string of Unicode characters, in Normalization Form C (NFC) and including at least one non-ASCII character, expressed in a standard Unicode Encoding Form (such as UTF-8).\\"
>
> The examples in 7483 contain all ASCII characters. Syntactically valid examples are shown in the corrected text.
>
> Ignore the backslash characters. They were inserted by the errata submission tool.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7483 (draft-ietf-weirds-json-response-14)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
> Publication Date    : March 2015
> Author(s)           : A. Newton, S. Hollenbeck
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Web Extensible Internet Registration Data Service
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>