IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-11.txt

Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> Thu, 18 December 2014 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@denic.de>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2D11A9046 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:44:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.86
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.86 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K3ViWsFa0zbm for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:44:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from office.denic.de (office.denic.de [81.91.160.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 624191A8A6D for <weirds@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 13:44:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from office.denic.de (mailout1.denic.de [10.122.34.3]) by office.denic.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB30A240021; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:44:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from x27.adm.denic.de (x28.fra2.if.denic.de [10.122.64.17]) by office.denic.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1Y1is6-0000Ul-ON; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:44:34 +0100
Received: from localhost by x27.adm.denic.de with local id 1Y1is6-0003ZJ-IK; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:44:34 +0100
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:44:34 +0100
From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <20141218214434.GJ28899@x28.adm.denic.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Michael Szucs <mszucs@afilias.info>, "draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap.all@tools.ietf.org>, "<weirds@ietf.org>" <weirds@ietf.org>
References: <20141218193248.30639.20974.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0F70F800-D7F1-49AF-97D3-34568DFA3C9C@viagenie.ca> <20141218205850.GH28899@x28.adm.denic.de> <CALaySJJ2FkkOE0L8EBbKmUnX5ukDN3RVpykC7XiT0wisP52dqg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJL5y8KhkwUV9yAhEW5oAD0njxoVGVbjdtUX0LKcgK8chw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJL5y8KhkwUV9yAhEW5oAD0njxoVGVbjdtUX0LKcgK8chw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Sender: Peter Koch <peter@denic.de>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/hJ7b9RNxTNekbP5Mv7WkkXD1tm4
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, "<weirds@ietf.org>" <weirds@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-11.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:44:43 -0000

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:35:24PM -0500, Barry Leiba wrote:

> I'll add that we have already run this version by IANA (and, so,
> ICANN), and they're fine with it.  Are you sure that they'd rather
> publish a separate document of their own for this?

it's probably worth distinguishing the IANA and the ICANN roles here.
When IANA staff says they are fine with it, I'd read that as 'the instructions
are clear' and 'we can implement this as desired' rather than 'we take
a position regarding the IETF politics'.  I.e., it is the usual
check of 'IANA considerations'.  My point is that the IETF needs to
be prepared.  Also, I'd not expect "IANA" to appear in the editor's section
of the second documrnt.

-Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email