IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [wellknown-uri-review] A .well-known registration for review: ni

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 07 May 2012 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E8E21F8613 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZVGl-6o9CAKZ for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2809A21F85B6 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 May 2012 08:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE95157D25; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:19:50 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1336403990; bh=UoSuBF3NL3vcjH Bmj1NRgPkp6e+0ZufSKzySQZxwMUs=; b=3pUByNUDfmRsmCgaX5trlQPE5EkTsp 1zkZUHCNmQV7UbfkYPQz8LLKCWyYvTLNMRf8g1N6JFCeGy+5B7g2nqTM5XuK/XDZ Zy7sQeNIWpcFqJWapLZnYNzeLbQTXmV0olD16+gfTz0E6J7ilzG6+bkoNs2F9cwn KxiP782d/7Kx/Qx7nvbkpk0QAfwuMrBF5YFu/gL5/asX6sDk1T29GyVUz9DF1JD+ CiFPPR8OVnKn3Eu5NVjK1cGZdyUdWwQLAIh7XsN5zeTEcEM+mhlkSNHumfqbIWOY xS6dnKqKnGVy3XOPRF+be17yHfdQkeVfGokld6G36mQqMKeTr99ULO3w==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id IefxvB8j94D4; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:19:50 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.9] (unknown [86.46.17.170]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40D9E157D22; Mon, 7 May 2012 16:19:50 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <4FA7E815.9060800@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 16:19:49 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201014A99@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <4F9FFFE6.9090304@cs.tcd.ie> <4FA7E71E.20901@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA7E71E.20901@isode.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org" <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>, "draft-farrell-decade-ni@tools.ietf.org" <draft-farrell-decade-ni@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [wellknown-uri-review] A .well-known registration for review: ni
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 15:19:53 -0000

On 05/07/2012 04:15 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 16:23, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> Thanks Eran,
>>
>> On 05/01/2012 03:44 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
>>> I am writing this in my capacity as the registry's Designated Expert.
>>>
>>> This will be an informal review as I have not received a proper
>>> review request using the template and email format specified in RFC
>>> 5785.
>> Sorry 'bout that - will fix it after this.
> Have you fixed that in -06?

I have now sent the mail in the required form I believe. This
wasn't a change to the draft but just to the incantation used
in the mail asking for review. If that's still wrong, I'll
just keep trying 'till its fixed;-)

Separately, -06 contains text on using 30x for .well-known/ni
responses that I hope addresses Eran's technical concern, but
I guess we'll see when he gets a chance to respond. (I only
suggested that change a day ago.)

S

> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email