Changes to datatracker related to IANA reviews

Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@iana.org> Thu, 12 September 2019 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <michelle.cotton@iana.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3138120219 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OrKoAXY4m9DC for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa5.dc.icann.org (ppa5.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6978F1201EF for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PFE112-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) by ppa5.dc.icann.org (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with ESMTPS id x8CHpQtU017804 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:51:27 GMT
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:51:24 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:51:24 -0700
From: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@iana.org>
To: IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Changes to datatracker related to IANA reviews
Thread-Topic: Changes to datatracker related to IANA reviews
Thread-Index: AQHVaZKx0ufI5+a6XEWrytRpkPbulA==
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:51:23 +0000
Message-ID: <2BE036B3-12ED-4F34-BED2-219CB2E8F4D0@iana.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.14.0.181208
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha256"; boundary="B_3651130283_1343931144"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-12_09:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/9V2x9W4T3b1yS2hNPuC_YE-PZto>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:51:32 -0000

Hello Working Group Chairs,

 

We wanted to provide you with an update to some improvements that have been implemented.

 

As mentioned in Montreal at the Working Group Chairs Lunch, IANA was working with Robert Sparks on making some changes to the document review section in the datatracker with regards to Expert Reviews for registrations in I-Ds.

Those changes have been implemented and we are now utilizing these new fields.

 

For an example of what these changes look like, see:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators/

 

This is new to us so we’re still getting familiar with populating these fields.

We hope this allows for more transparency regarding the status of the expert reviews in documents.

 

We are still working on providing better examples and documentation for Working Group Chairs, Shepherds and Authors.  We will keep you informed of the progress.

 

Please let us know if you have any questions.

 

Thanks,

Michelle