Re: Expiration impending: draft-ietf-avt-register-srtp

[Marshall Eubanks <[e-mail]>]

On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:09 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:

> I was not asking about the reminders generally. I was specifically referring to dead documents, which I have declared dead because in general I do not want revisions.
> 


Is it worth expending the cycles to have the reporting machinery sort through these cases and make (possibly wrong) 
decisions about what should and shouldn't get reminders ?

Also, it is possible that a document was killed by mistake, and a notice would not hurt before it disappears.

In general, I don't see that an occasional irrelevant reminder is a problem.

Regards
Marshall


> Keith 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail] 
>> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Brian Rosen
>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 4:08 PM
>> To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
>> Cc: Working Group Chairs
>> Subject: Re: Expiration impending: draft-ietf-avt-register-srtp
>> 
>> I like it.  It's a reminder to me to rev (or at least look 
>> at) my older drafts.
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> On Oct 11, 2010, at 10:57 AM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
>> 
>>> Is there a use for sending out such reminders for dead documents?
>>> 
>>> At the moment I cannot think of a use case.
>>> 
>>> regards
>>> 
>>> Keith
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 12:43 PM
>>> To: [e-mail]
>>> Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Roni Even
>>> Subject: Expiration impending: draft-ietf-avt-register-srtp
>>> 
>>> The following draft will expire soon:
>>> 
>>> Filename: draft-ietf-avt-register-srtp
>>> Title:    Policy for Registering SRTP Transforms
>>> State:    Dead
>>> Expires:  2010-10-22 (in 1 week, 3 days)
>> 
>>