RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-genarea-milestones-tool-05.txt> (Requirements for a Working Group Milestones Tool) to Informational RFC

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 07 September 2011 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D03C21F8CCF; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EDnVs7q+ccrh; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194A021F8BAC; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:29:26 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:29:25 -0700
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-genarea-milestones-tool-05.txt> (Requirements for a Working Group Milestones Tool) to Informational RFC
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-genarea-milestones-tool-05.txt> (Requirements for a Working Group Milestones Tool) to Informational RFC
Thread-Index: AcxtmsbpmZBBvcfaSYO5T1G1ni/kwwACliOQ
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DFB0B@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <EEC249F8-78EF-43BB-98EC-4A0D46EDC296@vigilsec.com> <CAC4RtVDcrjizWhZnTM_=x=-TXqsVApG-rDyxEpgT7Bnr8yOW0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDcrjizWhZnTM_=x=-TXqsVApG-rDyxEpgT7Bnr8yOW0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:27:36 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14 PM
> To: IETF discussion list
> Cc: IETF WG Chairs
> Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-genarea-milestones-tool-05.txt>
> (Requirements for a Working Group Milestones Tool) to Informational RFC
> 
> The current version seems to accurate reflect discussion, and what the
> IESG and most of the WG chairs want.  Ship it.

I agree; I've read it and it seems to match my understanding of consensus on the topic.

Make it so.