Re: ID Checklist Reminder

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

I thought we just had that discussion a couple of weeks ago.

The two nit checking machines should get aligned in the process
of developing the I-D submission tool (i.e. hopefully in
the Prague timescale). For now we have to live with the
discrepancies, which are relatively minor.

     Brian

(P.S. *Bad* idea to put the secretariat on copy. Everybody who does
a reply-all will generate a new ticket, and clearing out all those
tickets will delay real work. If you want a ticket number without
that side effect, put the secretariat on Bcc.)

Stewart Bryant wrote:
> [e-mail] wrote:
> 
>> Dear Working Group Chairs:
>>
>> In the course of your efforts, you will likely be submitting 
>> Internet-Drafts to the IESG for consideration as RFCs.  Please note 
>> that all Internet-Drafts offered for publication as RFCs must conform 
>> to the requirements specified in the ID-Checklist 
>> (http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html), or they will be returned to 
>> the author(s) for revision.  Therefore, the IETF Secretariat strongly 
>> recommends that you address all of the issues raised in this document 
>> before submitting a request to publish an Internet-Draft to the IESG.  
>> The content issues should be addressed early on in the work since they 
>> are integral to the technical makeup of the Internet-Draft.
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
> 
> Dear IETF Secretariat
> 
> What is the definitive version of ID nits that we should use?
> 
> I used the online version on the tools page before last IETF
> and it disagreed with the version that you used to check
> submissions. So what version are we supposed to use?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Stewart
> 
>