RE: [Tools-discuss] envelope rewriting changed for aliases

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 02 February 2024 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2B0C1516E0; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 09:42:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lONmwL_68E5C; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 09:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 105F9C151089; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 09:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 412HgSP9006989; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:42:28 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7504604B; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:42:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F1C46048; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:42:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:42:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([85.255.233.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 412HgQGH016407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:42:27 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'tools-discuss' <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Cc: 'Working Chairs' <wgchairs@ietf.org>
References: <d62062d4-57cb-4ed7-9482-47becc0e67ff@nostrum.com> <ZbyD9R6w49vfwVNc@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <ZbyD9R6w49vfwVNc@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: RE: [Tools-discuss] envelope rewriting changed for aliases
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 17:42:26 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <009301da55ff$30ab6010$92022030$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGpYDyBertZEjyQgaZ1ofcoagUHhAOSRECysTyoduA=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 85.255.233.77
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=zbxgApABo3tP1rGnC8iEL7EmhLMa5MEeEbCOQ0eBAr8=; b=y4T xSWDx37+hJTsBg3C7Bs5akE5YnaNcZ7qt3kjRM7h+2JAg03rJwL/exS5XldvABG/ s5WeJdG06iloHnsDe3TkB0de/Eb1PPmXhZrK3FXVl2e1crUhfJXS0cGzDJU6GNVE 64F9zMT0l+tOQQVc2gViiudp/TNSUu9gMVe5wUBVQ6jYAkHmGraBk0i4pHi9vByB iMn43CfLHm18VgXkUSUZ2bs1rIqHAEdEU2PXOdQf6Ag7NHcT3Xw5iL0z/Agoi8FN +dMh7pqfnMcHU1/Q7WBZ6QMDylroVxc6CAbxekpzmoSiTm2U9S9xNQomiPT6wGYy 1VQkir8N7W+noMDmaag==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28160.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.350-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--10.350-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28160.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--10.349600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 9zTThWtzImvxIbpQ8BhdbPHkpkyUphL9cV3n4J/0zUMhzl+r/gfj95bX moug+1t+Sb9vTYVglMhrCXi+CAenHLiCP5agS1Rx+s0+QZYAcN+Z2scyRQcer7cIt210bWgIjFK /NcS7G4kBkQt2wSBfKOLq62s6J248xjLqNkWhw0NANB89sV0bJ30tCKdnhB58vqq8s2MNhPDOG2 o4DtJIL/WLOdD33jzP0C1sQRfQzEHEQdG7H66TyH4gKq42LRYk0UVdTtp4Th1+P8m5MAicz6A3K UzBvNyJjlqvWw4uPrJ+3BndfXUhXQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/PcgMmAZCn0sdNAbkKqKlSER747w>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 17:42:36 -0000

Hi Robert,

> We put a change into postconfirm today that changes the envelope rewriting
> for aliases such that they should be more likely to succeed. This appears
to
> be working well. Please let us know if you see any new issues. (The best
way
> to report issues with specific messages is to email support@ietf.org).
> Generalized observations can be sent to the list.

Very many thanks.
I just tested this with two large companies that I know have been seeing
issues, and the problem is resolved.

Thanks to everyone who worked on this.

Cheers,
Adrian