IETF Logo Mail Archive

Doc shepherd writeup Q

"sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net> Tue, 27 February 2024 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9CEC151090 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:36:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=encrypted.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MuZ5Hadq3zqr for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xyz.hosed.org (xyz.hosed.org [71.114.67.91]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B985C14F75F for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C2B19C32C0 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:36:32 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xyz.hosed.org
Received: from xyz.hosed.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xyz.hosed.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHKGrZ1VQEf8 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:36:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-170-253-92.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.170.253.92]) by xyz.hosed.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 685A819C1A52 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:36:32 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=encrypted.net; s=default; t=1709069792; bh=iSplw8VCT5bf+dTklLlmcdhZqJqqVbLYCuzgBgWQFw0=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:From; b=vC/v3mCOhxgBQYl66mPlM6XMxvGHlnakrxwL7K2+POVX1GzODIhAfWAtiHMpq3025 JK70sM3LebuhaQrdBA1dMb/t4XZtV9I2820GswfkOL7r7Mj5SiWzynMRFTDNed6zWm XyyHnkM4TAnUH4oFcLiYY4mjGQg3YHZKEVG9+V6I=
From: "sbanks@encrypted.net" <sbanks@encrypted.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
Subject: Doc shepherd writeup Q
Message-Id: <FE1B8D7D-5412-4F4D-B0FF-88B34705F911@encrypted.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:36:20 -0800
To: WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/T95QhKjQOPff-8fZw0_cSwUQ4Us>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:36:38 -0000

Hi,
	I’m in the process of writing up a doc shep review, and question 10 notes:

10. Several IETF Areas have assembled [lists of common issues that their
    reviewers encounter][6]. For which areas have such issues been identified
    and addressed? For which does this still need to happen in subsequent
    reviews?

	Can someone point me to where this/these lists are posted? 

Thank you,
Sarah

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email