IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: automated id submission tool munging the abstract?

Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> Wed, 20 January 2010 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937873A6942 for <wgchairs@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:24:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.604, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id elxBa-7kLiVO for <wgchairs@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:24:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A513A6855 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:24:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>) id 1NXcPv-0007kB-8W; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:24:23 +0100
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:24:23 +0100
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: automated id submission tool munging the abstract?
In-Reply-To: <4B571EFB.3070907@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001201620590.26930@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
References: <4B571EFB.3070907@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: 'Working Group Chairs' <wgchairs@ietf.org>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:24:32 -0000

Hi Eliot

I run into the same issue recently and I was choosing to correct this 
leading to manual submission. The reason for this problem lies in the new 
ordering of the I-D sections (the Abstract jumped over the boilerplate 
text).

cheers,
  Bernie

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Eliot Lear wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I've submitted two drafts recently, and in both cases, the submission
> tool runs over the end of the abstract and into Status of this memo.  Is
> that intentional?  The two drafts in question are draft-lear-lisp-nerd
> and draft-lear-ietf-sasl-openid.  This punts the thing to a manual
> submission.
>
> Eliot
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email