Re: Preposterous claim

Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Tue, 17 June 2003 15:08 UTC

From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Message-Id: <200306171440.h5HEe8d18066@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
To: braden@ISI.EDU
Subject: Re: Preposterous claim
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:40:08 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.5a/makemail 2.9d
Sender: owner-wgchairs@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Preposterous claim
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: fenner@research.att.com
Cc: pekkas@netcore.fi, aboba@internaut.com, wgchairs@ietf.org

> *> >draft-ietf-aaa-transport 20030107 was in EDIT since 20021213 (25 days)
> *> >draft-ietf-aaa-transport 20030304 was in EDIT since 20030108 (55 days)
> *> >draft-ietf-aaa-transport 20030424 was in EDIT since 20030414 (10 days)
> *> >draft-ietf-aaa-transport 20030612 was in RFC-EDITOR since 20030424 (49 days)
> *> >
> *> >so the time this document spent in EDIT + RFC-EDITOR seems to be 139 days.

>I find your 139 day statement astonishing.

I'm sorry, Bob, I added 25 + 55 + 10 + 49.  Perhaps math works
differently in LA?

My statement did not include all of the relevant information, but
that's because I did only slight analysis of the data.  Astonishing
how hard it is to get from data to information.  I freely admit
that I only have data, and of course the rest of the history, which
I don't have, is important to feed into deriving information.  I
will be sure to refrain from contributing any data in the future,
to avoid misinterpretation.

  Bill