Re: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative reference
Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Fri, 29 July 2005 09:05 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DyQnl-0003eB-Un; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:05:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DyQnh-0003dZ-Jb for wgchairs@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:05:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA22370 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:05:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate4.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyRJK-0001fr-IW for wgchairs@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:37:47 -0400
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate4.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6T94rqQ226490 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:04:53 GMT
Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j6T94r08247056 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:04:53 +0100
Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6T94q5m014380 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:04:52 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6T94q6k014362; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:04:52 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-146-223-69.de.ibm.com [9.146.223.69]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA68500; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:04:50 +0200
Message-ID: <42E9F130.70602@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:04:48 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: john.loughney@nokia.com
References: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CEA41@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CEA41@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8f374d0786b25a451ef87d82c076f593
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: narten@us.ibm.com, wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative reference
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org
Opinion: for something that has already been approved by the IESG, this would count as a substantive change - so I would recommend a mini WG last call followed by a formal note to the AD, who should run it past the IESG before a formal note is sent to the RFC Editor. The reason I think it's substantive is that we tend to consider normative reference problems worthy of a DISCUSS during IESG evaluation. (Hmm. Not mentioned in draft-iesg-discuss-criteria-00.txt) Brian john.loughney@nokia.com wrote: > Thomas, > > What is the process to change something from Normative to Informative? > Can the authors do it themselves, do WG chairs need to be involved, > does the IESG need to be informed? I agree with you that many of > the Normative refs could be considered Informative. > > thanks, > John > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org]On >>Behalf Of ext Thomas Narten >>Sent: 27 July, 2005 20:47 >>To: wgchairs@ietf.org >>Subject: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative reference >> >> >>I happened to be looking at the RFC queue recently, and noticed that >>there are a number of documents currently blocked, pending the >>availability of a normative reference. >> >>I'd encourage you to look for documents that you are responsible for >>(i.e., those in your WG!) and determine what can be done to get the >>normative references satisfied. Your options are: >> >> - remove the normative reference, i.e., by tweaking the text to >> ensure that the way the reference is used, it is informational >> rather than normative. (note: this usually means more than just >> moving the reference to the "informative references" section; the >> wording surrounding the use of the reference needs to be of an >> informational nature.) Also, folk really should look at this >> option carefully. In my experience reviewing documents, I've seen >> plenty of "normative" references that IMO didn't need to be >> normative. See section 1.1 of RFC 3967 for some additional wording >> on the topic of normative vs. informative. >> >> - followup with the stuck document and help to get it completed and >> published. >> >>There's some 65 documents here. And some of been waiting many many >>_months_. >> >>To figure out what is going on for document X, go to >>www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html, and see what document X is waiting >>on. Then go see its status, etc. (You may need to do this >>recursively.) >> >>You might also find http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/iesg/rfc-deps.pdf >>useful, as it shows the normative reference relationships graphically. >> >>Thomas >> >>Days ID name >>==== ======= >>2 draft-ietf-enum-msg >>16 draft-zeilenga-ldap-assert >>16 draft-zeilenga-ldap-readentry >>17 draft-zeilenga-ldap-t-f >>26 draft-rescorla-dtls >>27 draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing >>32 draft-ietf-mip6-mipv6-mib >>32 draft-ietf-simple-xcap >>34 draft-ietf-ipcdn-docsisevent-mib >>34 draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-label >>47 draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines >>66 draft-ietf-msec-gsakmp-sec >>69 draft-ietf-l3vpn-mpls-vpn-mib >>74 draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-cc >>102 draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis >>110 draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3 >>110 draft-ietf-msec-mikey-dhhmac >>110 draft-ietf-sipping-kpml >>115 draft-ietf-simple-event-filter-funct >>115 draft-ietf-simple-filter-format >>117 draft-burmeister-avt-rtcp-feedback-sim >>117 draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-feedback >>117 draft-ietf-nsis-rsvp-sec-properties >>126 draft-ietf-sasl-anon >>131 draft-ietf-sip-guidelines >>136 draft-ietf-l2vpn-l2-framework >>136 draft-ietf-simple-xcap-pidf-manipulation-usage >>145 draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn >>145 draft-ietf-ldapbis-filter >>145 draft-ietf-ldapbis-models >>151 draft-ietf-simple-xcap-list-usage >>152 draft-zeilenga-ldup-sync >>165 draft-ietf-ldapbis-url >>185 draft-melnikov-imap-disc >>191 draft-ietf-ipoib-ip-over-infiniband >>194 draft-ietf-ipsec-esn-addendum >>194 draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2402bis >>202 draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-ah-algorithms >>202 draft-zeilenga-ldap-authzid >>236 draft-ietf-grow-collection-communities >>237 draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-analysis >>243 draft-behringer-mpls-security >>243 draft-ietf-mboned-mroutesec >>272 draft-ietf-l3vpn-as2547 >>272 draft-ietf-l3vpn-rfc2547bis >>286 draft-holbrook-idmr-igmpv3-ssm >>293 draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2 >>297 draft-ietf-isis-igp-p2p-over-lan >>303 draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-algorithms >>303 draft-ietf-ipsec-ui-suites >>332 draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements >>332 draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy >>332 draft-ietf-mboned-ssm232 >>411 draft-ietf-ospf-graceful-impl-report >>419 draft-ietf-magma-igmp-proxy >>433 draft-ietf-ipoib-architecture >>474 draft-ietf-imapext-condstore >>495 draft-ietf-ospf-2547-dnbit >>503 draft-ietf-magma-igmpv3-and-routing >>516 draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-ccm >>559 draft-ietf-magma-snoop >>684 draft-ietf-mmusic-sdpng-trans >>838 draft-ietf-idwg-beep-idxp >>838 draft-ietf-idwg-requirements >>853 draft-ietf-smime-symkeydist >> >> >> > > > >
- RE: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative refe… john.loughney
- Re: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative refe… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative refe… john.loughney
- Re: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative refe… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative refe… Thomas Narten
- RE: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative refe… john.loughney
- Re: RFC queue documents stuck on a normative refe… Thomas Narten