Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 02 June 2011 02:14 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66726E06C5 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J79BaZ4LpxxS for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B557E06D9 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydra-3.local (99-152-144-32.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.144.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p522En6f084426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:14:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4DE6F219.6050207@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:14:49 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ed Juskevicius <edj.etc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release
References: <E1QOyhh-00089s-Ib@merlot.tools.ietf.org> <BDA9E494-29D8-473E-97D8-F899321BE72C@vigilsec.com> <7911C644-E2A3-4BF8-842A-1DB1A4450E69@ietf.org> <34C5B72C-5BED-495B-87FB-7682A1CFD894@cisco.com> <4DDD64D6.1060800@levkowetz.com> <7462_1306357779_p4PL9cph011040_EABE5BCF-FFA9-47CE-BC5E-3AC2B0839FBE@cisco.com> <1306394510.32156.454.camel@destiny> <11CAF335-3DDF-4827-8A9D-883003061F96@vpnc.org> <07E811C5-5BA3-4A4C-BB6D-87E7466AF15D@cisco.com> <4DE5564C.10605@gmail.com> <7FE56379-DA10-4837-8D96-F67B22BD5A30@cisco.com> <BANLkTinxGVxKPypQOfJe6FeXnMGw-hWE7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinxGVxKPypQOfJe6FeXnMGw-hWE7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 99.152.144.32 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wgchairs>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 02:14:55 -0000
On 6/1/11 19:02, Jun 1, Ed Juskevicius wrote: > Having postulated the above, I wonder if an I-D could (or should) be > able to be "watched" in more than one WG at time. Yes, yes, a million times yes. Consider draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-sip (ROHC and SIP), draft-ietf-sip-compression (ROHC and SIP), draft-ietf-sipping-sigcomp-dictionary (SIPPING and ROHC), draft-garcia-simple-presence-dictionary (SIMPLE and ROHC), and draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance (SIPCORE and GEOPRIV). And those are just documents that I've personally been involved with (either as an author, a major contributor, or a document shepherd). I imagine there are documents that straddle GEOPRIV and ECRIT as well, but I'm not following those groups closely enough to cite specific ones. I would have to imagine that other areas have similar situations arise from time to time. In any case, we do quite occasionally produce documents that necessarily straddle working groups, in that they deal with the intersection of the technologies that those groups have been chartered to address. > If yes, then in how many different WG should the same I-D be able to > be in the "WG Chair is Watching" state? From a practical perspective, there *probably* won't ever be more than two groups watching at a time. From a tools perspective, I think it would be artificial to limit the number at all. It would be infuriating to be bitten by a tools limitation when and if the first legitimately three-group document comes floating along. So, if there is a hard limit, it should be >>2. /a
- Re: New datatracker release Andrew G. Malis
- Re: New datatracker release Paul Hoffman
- New datatracker release IETF Chair
- Re: New datatracker release Fred Baker
- Re: New datatracker release Russ Housley
- Re: New datatracker release Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: New datatracker release Fred Baker
- Re: New datatracker release Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: New datatracker release Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: New datatracker release Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: New datatracker release Fred Baker
- Re: New datatracker release edj.etc
- Re: New datatracker release Paul Hoffman
- Re: New datatracker release Fred Baker
- Re: New datatracker release Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Fred Baker
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Ed Juskevicius
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Donald Eastlake
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Fred Baker
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Adam Roach
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Ted Lemon
- RE: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release David Harrington
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release edj.etc
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Randy Presuhn
- Re: New datatracker release Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [BOFCHAIRS] New datatracker release Benoit Claise