Re: [woes] New WOES charter proposal

Basically, yeah, although it may be handy to incorporate some parts of CMS by reference (semantics/definitions of certain fields, say).  

--Richard

On Jul 25, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:

> That works for me. Certainly when I talk about basing something on
> CMS, what I mean
> is that I'm imitating CMS, not that there is a normative dependency.
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 25, 2011, at 13:16, Leif Johansson wrote:
>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> On 07/25/2011 06:59 PM, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
>>>> I now find myself hoping this is not the beginning someone making a case
>>>> for ASN.1 encoding in WOES.
>>>> 
>>>> For my edification, can someone comment on how CMS would likely be
>>>> referenced in WOES? Would it likely be a normative reference (i.e. key
>>>> transport/wrapping, as it is in xmlenc-core), or otherwise would it
>>>> probably be just informational?
>>> 
>>> We seem to be bike-shedding on the words "based on" in the charter.
>>> Perhaps it helps if we say something to the effect that WOES draws
>>> upon experience from CMS and XML-dsig/enc and leave it at that.
>>> 
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> 
>> - m&m
>> 
>> Matt Miller - <mamille2@cisco.com>
>> Collaboration Software Group - Cisco Systems, Inc.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> woes mailing list
>> woes@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> woes mailing list
> woes@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes