Re: [wpkops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation-00.txt

2.1.2 states:
[RFC5280] requires that a CRL entry specify a reason code...

I think this is incorrect.  RFC 5280, Section 5.3, paragraph 3 states:
... CRL issuers SHOULD include reason codes...

That's the only place I can find anything close to a requirement to specify
reason codes, so I would suggest that 2.1.2 be amended to say that RFC5280
strongly encourages that a CRL entry specify a reason code

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wpkops [mailto:wpkops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-
> drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 11:03 AM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: wpkops@ietf.org
> Subject: [wpkops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation-00.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Web PKI OPS Working Group of the
> IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Web PKI Operations: Revocation and Status
>         Authors         : Phillip Hallam-Baker
>                           David Chadwick
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 17
> 	Date            : 2014-05-13
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document describes the certificate status mechanisms supported
>    in the Web PKI
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation-00
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wpkops mailing list
> wpkops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops

Re: [wpkops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-wpkops-revocation-00.txt

Attachment: smime.p7s