Forwarded: LAPB MIB

"Dean D. Throop" <> Wed, 23 September 1992 19:44 UTC

Received: from by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16103; 23 Sep 92 15:44 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16099; 23 Sep 92 15:44 EDT
Received: from by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23203; 23 Sep 92 15:48 EDT
Received: from by (5.4.1/dg-rtp-proto) id AA18258; Wed, 23 Sep 1992 15:04:12 -0400
Received: by walrus (5.4.1/140.2) id AA02263; Wed, 23 Sep 1992 15:01:47 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1992 15:01:47 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Dean D. Throop" <>
Message-Id: <9209231901.AA02263@walrus>
Subject: Forwarded: LAPB MIB
Cc: x25mib@dg-rtp

>From  Tue Sep 22 14:43:59 1992
>From: "Kim (K.L.) Curran" <>
>Message-Id: <"26502 Tue Sep 22 13:15:08 1992"> 
>Subject: LAPB MIB 
>To be consistent with other variables of the type IfIndexType, 
>(ie lapbAdminIndex), shouldn't lapdFlowIfIndex be changed to 

I think you are correct- it would be more consistent with
the shorter name.  

If the MIB was still in the working group, I would make the 
change.  But since the MIB is being reviewed by the IAB and this 
inconsistency doesn't hurt too much, I don't think I'll try to 
change it now.  

>#include <disclaimer.h>
>Kim Curran, Network Management Systems, Bell-Northern Research, Ltd. 
>                          Ottawa Ontario Canada                

Dean Throop